Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Karunatillake N, Jennings N (2005) Is it worth arguing? In: Rahwan I, Moratïs P, Reed C
(eds) Argumentation in multi-agent systems. Proceedings of ArgMAS'04. Springer, Berlin,
pp 234-250
Martin RW, Scheerhorn DR (1985) What are conversational arguments? Toward a natural language
user's perspective. In: Cox JR, Sillars MO, Walker GB (eds) Argument and social practice.
Speech Communication Association, Annandale, pp 705-722
Myers DG, Lamm H (1976) The group polarization phenomenon. Psychol Bull 83:602-627
Paglieri F (2007) No more charity, please! Enthymematic parsimony and the pitfall of benevolence.
In: Hansen H, Tindale C, Johnson R, Blair JA (eds) Dissensus and the search for common
ground. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1-26, CD-ROM
Paglieri F (2009) Ruinous arguments: escalation of disagreement and the dangers of arguing. In:
Ritola J (ed) Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA 2009. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1-15, CD-
ROM
Paglieri F (2013a) Choosing to argue: towards a theory of argumentative decisions. J Pragmat
59B:153-163
Paglieri F (2013b) Argumentation, decision and rationality. In: Mohammed D, Lewinski M (eds)
Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of OSSA 2013. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1-13, CD-ROM
Paglieri F (2013c) Agreements as the grease (not the glue) of society: a cognitive and social science
perspective. In: Ossowski S (ed) Agreement technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 43-52
Paglieri F, Castelfranchi C (2010) Why argue? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation.
Argument Comput 1:71-91
Paglieri F, Woods J (2011a) Enthymematic parsimony. Synthese 178:461-501
Paglieri F, Woods J (2011b) Enthymemes: from reconstruction to understanding. Argumentation
25(2):127-139
Petty R, Cacioppo J (1977) Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. J Pers
Soc Psychol 35(9):645-655
Petty R, Cacioppo J (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to
attitude change. Springer, New York
Pollock J (1992) How to reason defeasibly. Artif Intell 57:1-42
Prakken H (2000) On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments.
In: Ojeda-Aciego M, de Guz man IP, Brewka G, Moniz Pereira L (eds) Logics in artificial
intelligence: proceedings of JELIA 2000. Springer, Berlin, pp 224-238
Prunty A, Klopf D, Ishii S (1991) Argumentativeness: Japanese and American tendencies to
approach and avoid conflict. Commun Res Rep 7:75-79
Rahwan I, Larson K (2009) Argumentation and game theory. In: Rahwan I, Simari G (eds)
Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 321-339
Riveret R, Prakken H, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2008) Heuristics in argumentation: a game-theoretical
investigation. In: Besnard P, Doutre S, Hunter A (eds) Proceedings of COMMA 2008. Ios Press,
Amsterdam, pp 324-335
Schoemaker P (1982) The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations.
J Econ Lit 20(2):529-563
Secchi D (2011) Extendable rationality: understanding decision making in organizations. Springer,
New York
Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford
Sunstein CR (2002) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10(2):175-195
Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how
collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Little/Brown, London
Svejnar J (1986) Bargaining power, fear of disagreement, and wage settlements: theory and
evidence from the U.S. Industry. Econometrica 54(5):1055-1078
van Eemeren F, Grootendorst R (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: the Pragma-
dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vuchinich S (1990) The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In: Grimshaw
AD (ed) Conflict talk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 118-138
Search WWH ::




Custom Search