Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
25
system, and their root-mean-square distance to the origin obtains the value 2. This
transformation is performed according to
u (j)
i
u (j)
i
v (j)
i
1
ˇ
=
v (j)
i
1
T i
,
(1.54)
ˇ
where the transformation matrices T i are given by
u (j)
i
s i
0
s i
j
v (j)
i
T i =
0
s i
s i
j
00
1
2
with s i =
.
(1.55)
(u (j)
i
u (j)
i
(v (j)
i
v (j)
i
j ) 2
+
j ) 2
j
F is then obtained based on ( 1.52 ), where
A normalised fundamental matrix
the image points (u (j)
i
,v (j)
i
, 1 ) T
are replaced by the normalised image points
u (j)
i
v (j)
i
, 1 ) T , followed by enforcing the singularity constraint on
F using the
(
ˇ
,
ˇ
F according to F
SVD-based procedure described above. Denormalisation of
=
T 2 ˇ FT 1 then yields the fundamental matrix F for the original image points.
The linear methods to determine the fundamental matrix F all rely on error mea-
sures which are purely algebraic rather than physically motivated. In contrast, the
'gold standard method' described by Hartley and Zisserman ( 2003 ) yields a fun-
damental matrix which is optimal in terms of the Euclidean distance in the im-
age plane between the measured point correspondences
S 1
S 2
˜
˜
x i and
x i and the es-
x (e)
i
x (e)
i
S 1
S 2
timated point correspondences
˜
and
˜
, which exactly satisfy the relation
x (e)T
i
x (e)
i
S 2
F S 1
˜
˜
=
0. It is necessary to minimise the error term
d 2 S 1
x (e i
d 2 S 2
x (e i .
x i , S 1
x i , S 2
E G =
+
(1.56)
i
In ( 1.56 ), the distance measure d( S
x , S
x (e) ) describes the Euclidean distance in the
˜
˜
x (e) , i.e. the reprojection error. To
minimise the error term ( 1.56 ), Hartley and Zisserman ( 2003 ) suggest defining the
camera projection matrices as P 1 =[
S
S
image plane between the image points
x and
˜
˜
I
|
0
]
(called the canonical form) and P 2 =
[
and the set of three-dimensional scene points that belong to the measured
point correspondences S 1
M
|
t
]
x (e)
i
x i and S 2
x i as W x i . It then follows that S 1
P 1 W
˜
˜
˜
=
x i and
˜
x (e)
i
S 2
P 2 W
x i . The Euclidean error term E G according to ( 1.56 ) is minimised with
respect to the projection matrix P 2 , defined by the matrix M and the vector t , and the
scene points W
˜
=
˜
˜
x i . Due to the special form of camera matrix P 1 , the matrix F follows
x (e)
i
x (e)
i
M . The correspondingly estimated image points S 1
and S 2
as F
=[
t
] ×
˜
˜
exactly
x (e)T
i
x (e)
i
satisfy the relation S 1
F S 2
0. The Euclidean error term ( 1.56 ) is minimised
with a nonlinear optimisation algorithm such as the Levenberg-Marquardt method
(Press et al., 2007 ).
=
Search WWH ::




Custom Search