Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
and the point exactly below the observer) and the 'mirror meridian' (the great circle
orthogonal to the photometric equator on which θ i =
θ e ). The intensity values are
then extracted in photometric longitude (the angle measured along the photometric
equator) and photometric latitude (the angle measured along the mirror meridian).
According to McEwen ( 1991 ), the opposition effect parameters B 0 and h have a
significant influence on the observed reflectance only for phase angles below about
5 , where it is not favourable to apply photoclinometric techniques also with respect
to illumination and viewing geometry. As it tends to be difficult to adapt the lunar-
Lambert function to the Hapke function near the limb of the planetary disk, values of
θ e > 70 +
α/ 9 are not taken into account for the parameter estimation. This is no
restriction, because photoclinometric methods are preferentially applied for small
values of θ e , corresponding to a viewing direction approximately perpendicular to
the surface.
The behaviour of L(α) is illustrated by McEwen ( 1991 ) as a sequence of refer-
ence diagrams for different values of the single-scattering albedo w , different pa-
rameter values of the function p(α) , and macroscopic roughness values between 0
and 50 . For low-albedo surfaces with w
0 . 1 and macroscopic roughness values
θ larger than about 10 , the shape of the angular scattering function has only a mi-
nor influence on L(α) . For small phase angles, L(α) is always close to 1, while
it approaches zero for phase angles larger than about 140 . For intermediate phase
angles, the behaviour of L(α) strongly depends on the value of θ , where in the prac-
tically relevant range for values of θ between 0 and 30 , L(α) monotonously de-
creases with increasing θ . As a consequence, the reflectance behaviour becomes in-
creasingly Lambertian for increasing phase angles and θ values (cf. Fig. 8.1 ). For the
lunar surface, the behaviour of L(α) can also be expressed as a third-order polyno-
mial in α (McEwen, 1996 ). The lunar-Lambert reflectance function with L(α) as es-
tablished by McEwen ( 1991 ) is used in Sects. 8.2 and 8.4 for the three-dimensional
reconstruction of lunar craters and lunar volcanic features.
8.2 Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Lunar Impact Craters
8.2.1 Shadow-Based Measurement of Crater Depth
The depth of a crater can be estimated based on the length of the shadow cast by the
crater rim, when the shadow ends near the crater centre (Pike, 1988 ). A method gen-
erally applicable to images acquired under oblique viewing conditions is described
by Pike ( 1988 ) (cf. Appendix A by Clow and Pike therein), who utilises it for mea-
suring the depths of simple bowl-shaped craters and the heights of their rims above
the surrounding surface in Mariner 10 images of the planet Mercury and obtains a
depth-diameter relation for Mercurian craters.
A sketch of depth-diameter relations for impact craters on Mercury, the Moon,
Mars, and the Earth established by Pike ( 1980 ) is shown in Fig. 8.3 . It has been
observed by Pike ( 1980 , 1988 ) and also in previous classical works, e.g. by Wood
Search WWH ::




Custom Search