Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
These equations become more illustrative if we consider the initial values (subscript 0)
before the reaction takes place. Equation
(3.55)
leads to
n
NO
þ 2
n
N
2
¼
n
NO
;0
þ 2
n
N
2
;0
(3.57)
which can be rearranged to give
n
NO
n
NO
;0
¼ 2
n
N
2
n
N
2
;0
(3.58)
or
n
NO
n
NO
;0
1
n
N
2
n
N
2
;0
1=2
¼
(3.59)
or
D
n
NO
n
NO
¼
D
n
N
2
(3.60)
n
N
2
In general, for any single reaction, we can write
D
n
j
n
j
¼
n
ext
;
c
j
(3.61)
and we can write N
S
1 independent combinations of these relations among N
S
chemical
species in a reaction to relate the changes in the number of moles of all species to each other.
There is therefore always a single composition variable that describes the relationship among
all species in a single reaction. In the preceding Eqn
(3.61)
, we defined n
ext
as the relation
between the n
j
's,
n
j
¼
n
j;
0
þ
v
j
n
ext
(3.62)
We call the quantity n
ext
the number of moles extent.
For simple problems, we most commonly use one of the reactants as the concentration
variable to work with and label that species A to use C
A
as the variable representing compo-
sition changes during reaction. We also make the stoichiometric coefficient of that species
v
A
¼
1.
Another way of representing a single reaction is the fractional conversion f, a dimensionless
quantity ranging from 0, before reaction, to 1, when the reaction is complete. We define f
through the relation
n
A
0
1
f
A
n
A
¼
(3.63)
To make 0
1, we have to choose species A as the limiting reactant so that this reactant
disappears and f
A
approaches unity when the reaction is complete. We can then define all
species through the relation
f
A
D
n
j
n
j
¼
n
A
0
f
A
;
c
j
(3.64)
For multiple reactions, we need a variable to describe each reaction. Furthermore, we
cannot in general find a single key reactant to call species A in the definition of f
A
. However,
Search WWH ::
Custom Search