References - Motion Correction in Thoracic Positron Emission Tomography - page 85

117. D. Rueckert, P. Aljabar, R.A. Heckemann, J.V. Hajnal, A. Hammers, Diffeomorphic registra-
tion using B-splines, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention ,ed.
by R. Larsen, M. Nielsen, J. Sporring. Volume 4191 of LNCS (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg,
2006), pp. 702-709
118. L. Ruthotto, Mass-Preserving Registration of Medical Images . German diploma thesis
(Mathematics), Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of Münster,
2010
119. L. Ruthotto, F. Gigengack, M. Burger, C.H. Wolters, X. Jiang, K.P. Schäfers, J. Modersitzki,
A simplified pipeline for motion correction in dual gated cardiac PET, in Bildverarbeitung
für die Medizin (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 51-56
120. K.C. Schmidt, F.E. Turkheimer, Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography. Q. J.

Nucl. Med. 46 (1), 70-85 (2002)
121. H. Schumacher, J. Modersitzki, B. Fischer, Combined reconstruction and motion correction
in SPECT imaging. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56 , 73-80 (2009)
122. A.J. Schwarz, M.O. Leach, Implications of respiratory motion for the quantification of 2D
MR spectroscopic imaging data in the abdomen. Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (8), 2105-2116 (2000)
123. W.P. Segars, M. Mahesh, T.J. Beck, E.C. Frey, B.M.W. Tsui, Realistic CT simulation using
the 4d XCAT phantom. Med. Phys. 35 (8), 3800-3808 (2008)
124. L.A. Shepp, Y. Vardi, Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE
Trans. Med. Imaging 1 (2), 113-122 (1982)
125. D. Sun, S. Roth, M.J. Black. A quantitative analysis of current practices in optical flow
estimation and the principles behind them. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 106 (2), 115-137 (2014)
126. D. Tenbrinck, S. Schmid, X. Jiang, K.P. Schäfers, J. Stypmann, Histogram-based optical flow
for motion estimation in ultrasound imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 47 (1-2), 138-150 (2013)
127. M. Teräs, T. Kokki, N. Durand-Schaefer, T. Noponen, M. Pietilä, J. Kiss, E. Hoppela,
H. Sipilä, J. Knuuti, Dual-gated cardiac PET-clinical feasibility study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med.

Mol. Imaging 37 , 505-516 (2010)
128. K. Thielemans, E. Asma, R.M. Manjeshwar, Mass-preserving image registration using
free-form deformation fields, in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging
Conference (NSS/MIC) , Orlando, 2009
129. H. Ue, H. Haneishi, H. Iwanaga, K. Suga, Nonlinear motion correction of respiratory-gated
lung SPECT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25 (4), 486-495 (2006)
130. A. Van Der Gucht, B. Serrano, F. Hugonnet, B. Paulmier, N. Garnier, M. Faraggi, Impact of
a new respiratory amplitude-based gating technique in evaluation of upper abdominal PET
lesions. Eur. J. Radiol. 83 (3), 509-515 (2014)
131. W. van Elmpt, J. Hamill, J. Jones, D. De Ruysscher, P. Lambin, M. Öllers, Optimal gating
compared to 3D and 4D PET reconstruction for characterization of lung tumours. Eur. J.

Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 38 , 843-855 (2011)
132. T. Vercauteren, X. Pennec, A. Perchant, N. Ayache, Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-
parametric image registration. NeuroImage 45 (1), S61-S72 (2009)
133. D. Visvikis, O. Barret, T.D. Fryer, F. Lamare, A. Turzo, Y. Bizais, C.C. Le Rest, Evaluation of
respiratory motion effects in comparison with other parameters affecting PET image quality,
in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) ,Rome,
2004, vol. 6, pp. 3668-3672
134. Y. Wang, E. Vidan, G.W. Bergman, Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest
period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 213 (3), 751-758 (1999)
135. J. Weickert, A. Bruhn, T. Brox, N. Papenberg, A Survey on Variational Optic Flow Methods
for Small Displacements . Volume 10 of Mathematics in Industry (Springer, Berlin, 2006),

pp. 103-136
136. C. Würslin, H. Schmidt, P. Martirosian, C. Brendle, A. Boss, N.F. Schwenzer, L. Stegger,
Respiratory motion correction in oncologic PET using T1-weighted MR imaging on a
simultaneous whole-body PET/MR system. J. Nucl. Med. 54 (3), 464-471 (2013)