Disease Resistance in Chickpea - Translational Genomics for Crop Breeding: Biotic Stress - page 205

Location of markers associated with QTLs or genes conferring resistance to key chickpea diseases.

Table 11.1.

Disease Gene/QTL LG Indicative markers References

Ascochyta
blight

QTL AR1 LGIV GAA47, SCAR733b,

CaETR-1

Flandez Galvez et al 2003; Iruela et al 2006;
Tar'an et al 2007; Rajesh and Muehlbauer
2008, Anbessa et al 2009; Kottapalli et al
2009, Madrid et al 2012

QTL AR2 LGIV TA72, TA146, SCY17,

TA176, TA2, TS54,
STMS11, TAA170, H2G20,
H3D09, H1A12

Tekeoglu et al 2002; Udupa and Baum 2003;
Iruela et al 2006; Lichtenzveig et al 2006,
Tar'an et al 2007; Kottapalli et al 2009;
Aryamanesh et al 2010

QTL AR3 LGII GA16, TA194, TR19 Udupa and Baum 2003; Cho et al 2004; Cobos

et al 2006; Lichtenzveig et al 2006, Iruela et al
2007; Anbessa et al 2009

QTL AR4 LGIII STMS28, TS12b, TA64,

TR58, TA34, TA142

Flandez Galvez et al 2003; Tar'an et al 2007;
Anbessa et al 2009; Kottapalli et al 2009;
Aryamanesh et al 2010

QTL AR5 LGVI TA176 Anbessa et al 2009

QTL AR6 LGVIII TA3, TS45, H3C11a Flandez-Galvez et al 2003; Lichtenzveig et al

2006; Anbessa et al 2009

Fusarium wilt foc-0 1 LGV OPJ20 600 , TR59 Cobos et al 2005

foc-0 2 LGII TA59 Halila et al 2009

foc-1 “ ASAPCs27, H3A12, TA110 Mayer et al 1997; Gowda et al 2009

foc-2 “ TA96, H3A12 “

foc-3 “ TA96, TA27, CS27,

H1B06y, TA194

Sharma et al 2004, Gowda et al 2009

foc-4 “ TA96, CS27, Winter et al 2000

R-2609-1 Benko-Iseppon et al 2003

foc-5 “ TA59, TA96, TA27 Winter et al 2000, Cobos et al 2009; Iruela

et al 2007; Halila et al 2009

Rust Uca1/uca1 LGVII TA18, TA180 Madrid et al 2008

Botrytis grey
mould

QTL-1 LGVI SA14-TS71rts36r Anuradha et al 2011

QTL-2
QTL-3

LGVIII TA25, TA144

TA159,TA118

“

1 Aryamanesh et al 2010 identified two different QTL in this genomic region of LGIV.

specificity (0, 1A, 1B/C, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6)
(Jimenez-Dıaz et al. 2011). The yellowing patho-
type includes races 0 and 1B/C, whereas the wilt-
ing pathotype includes the other six races (races
1A through 6). A pathogenicity assay on a set
of chickpea differentials is required to identify
the races and pathotypes (Sharma et al. 2005).
Molecular markers are available for identify-
ing certain races (Jimenez-Gasco et al. 2003),
however, it is recommended that races identi-

fied solely by molecular markers, especially in
areas where the disease is first reported, should
be confirmed by pathogenicity assays on chick-
pea differentials. The pathogenic races also dif-
fer in their geographic distribution: races 2, 3,
and 4 are found in India, whereas races 0, 1B/C,
5, and 6 are found mainly in the Mediterranean
region and the United States. Race 1A is more
widespread and has been reported in India, the
Mediterranean region, and the U.S.