Geography Reference
In-Depth Information
a
N1, 50
(10)
(7,1)
(3,3)
(3,3)
N3, 30
N5, 6
N4, 8
(5,4)
(7,1)
(3,4)
N2, 50
N6, 10
N7, 8
(5)
Destination #1
(5,5)
(3,5)
N13
N9, 25
(14,4)
(6,4)
(6,4)
(8,1)
N10, 30
(6,3)
(3,3)
N11, 8
N8, 65
(15)
(6,4)
(3,2)
LEGEND
(3,3)
N12, 18
N14
Node ID, Max Capacity
Destination #2
(Initial Occupancy)
(Max Capacity, Travel time)
Edge
Node ID
Node
Destination
b
Group of Evacuees
Start
Time
Dest.
Time
4
5
5
14
15
15
15
16
16
Route with Schedule
ID
Source
Group
Size
A
N8
N8
N8
N1
N1
N1
N2
N2
N1
6
6
3
3
3
1
2
3
3
N8(T0)−N10(T3)−N13
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
B
N8(T1)−N10(T4)−N13
N8(T0)−N11(T3)−N14
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
N1(T0)−N3(T1)−N4(T4)−N6(T8)−N10(T13)−N13
N1(T0)−N3(T2)−N4(T5)−N6(T9)−N10(T14)−N13
N1(T0)−N3(T1)−N5(T4)−N7(T8)−N11(T13)−N14
N2(T0)−N3(T1)−N5(T4)−N7(T8)−N11(T13)−N14
N2(T0)−N3(T3)−N4(T6)−N6(T10)−N10(T15)−N13
N1(T1)−N3(T2)−N5(T5)−N7(N9)−N11(T14)−N14
Fig. 6.12 Building evacuation problem. ( a ) Network model for simple building evacuation
scenario. ( b ) Example of evacuation route scheduling
6.18
Monticello Power Plant Case Study
In the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, the US Nuclear Regulatory
Commission is considering annual revisions of evacuation plans for nuclear power
plants (USA-Today 2011 ). The commission's interest in regularly updated plans due
to changes in nearby populations or transportation networks is likely to accelerate
adoption of CCRP-like computer-based selection of evacuation routes over manual
methods (Vasconez and Kehrli 2010 ).AsshowninFig. 6.13 , the Monticello nuclear
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search