Image Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
The second equation in Eq. 4.15 is also derived in the same way. Note here
Eq. 4.48 and Eq. 4.49 which will be derived later.
A similar relationship holds concerning the connectivity index ( R, H, Y )
as is given below.
Property 4.4. Let us adopt the same notation as in Property 4.3 above, and
let us express the connectivity index of the 1-voxel
x 20 by ( R ( m ) (
) ,H ( m )
X
,
x
) ,Y ( m ) (
)) instead of ( R ( m ) (
) ,H ( m ) (
) ,Y ( m ) (
(
X
,
x
X
,
x
x
x
x
)) so that depen-
dency on the set
X
may be explicitly shown. If we define a set
X
=
{ x 10 ,
x 11 ,...,
x 38 }
x ij
x ij
,where
= 1
as in Property 4.3, and if we de-
note by ( R ( m ) (
) ,H ( m ) (
) ,Y ( m ) (
X
,
x
X
,
x
X
,
x
)) the connectivity index of
x
with the local subpattern
X
in its 26-neighborhood, the following relations
hold.
R (6) (
1 = H (26) (
Y (26) (
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
R (26) (
1 = H (6) (
Y (6) (
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
1 = H (18 ) (
Y (18 ) (
R (18) (
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
R (18 ) (
1 = H (18) (
Y (18) (
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
)
X
,
x
) .
(4.17)
Furthermore, Y ( m ) (
X
,
x
)= 1 if and only if R ( m ) (
X
,
x
)= H ( m ) (
X
,
x
)= 0 ,
and otherwise, Y ( m ) (
X
,
x
)= 0 [Toriwaki02a, Toriwaki02b].
Theorem 4.2. Assuming that the density values of a 1-voxel
x
and its 26-
neighborhood are given, the 1-voxel
x
is m -deletable if and only if the con-
nectivity index ( R ( m ) (
) ,H ( m ) (
) ,Y ( m ) (
x
x
x
)) = ( 1 , 0 , 0 ).
(Proof) A 1-voxel
x
is not deletable if it is a 3D interior voxel, that is,
Y ( m ) (
)= 1 . Therefore, Y ( m ) (
x
x
) should be equal to zero for
x
to be m -
deletable. Let us assume that by deleting a 1-voxel
with the connectivity
index ( l, n, 0), α connected components and β holes are created and β holes
and γ cavities vanish. Then, l = α + β + 1 ,and n = β + γ .Avoxel
x
x
is
deletable if and only if
α = β = β = γ = 0 .
(4.18)
Eq. 4.18 is equivalent to “ l = 1 and n = 0 ” [Toriwaki02a, Toriwaki02b].
Corollary 4.1. 1-voxel
x
is m -deletable if and only if
Nc ( m ) (
)= 1 and R ( m ) = 1 .
x
(4.19)
For a 2D image, preservation of the values of the Euler characteristic is
a necessary and sucient condition of the topology preservation. That is, to
test the deletability of a 1-pixel in a 2D figure, calculation of the Euler char-
acteristic is enough. In a 3D image, on the contrary, preservation of the Euler
characteristic does not always mean the deletability of a 1-voxel. The rea-
son is the existence of a hole (handle). By deleting a 1-voxel, separation of a
Search WWH ::




Custom Search