Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Scenario Two: Big Oil and Gas
Mr. Drew is an IT director at Big Oil and Gas, a medium-sized petrochemical company
based in Houston. It also has operations in the Gulf of Mexico and in South America. Mr.
Drew is in charge of the network infrastructure, including routers and switches. His group
includes personnel who can install and configure Cisco routers and switches.
The Big Oil and Gas CIO wants to begin migrating from the voice network to an Unified
Communications (UC) solution to reduce circuit and management costs. Existing data
WA N c i r c u i t s h a v e 5 0 p e r c e n t u t i l i z a t i o n o r l e s s b u t s p i k e u p t o 8 0 p e r c e n t w h e n s p o r a d i c
FTP transfers occur.
Mr. Drew hands you the diagram shown in Figure 16-3. The exiting data network includes
35 sites with approximately 30 people at each site. The network is Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) WAN, with approximately 200 people at the headquarters. The WAN
links range from 384-kbps circuits to T1 speeds. Remote-site applications include statisti-
cal files and graphical-site diagrams that are transferred using FTP from remote sites to the
headquarters.
Headquarters
MPLS
WAN
35 Remote Sites
Figure 16-3
Big Oil and Gas Current Network
Mr. Drew wants a UC solution that manages the servers at headquarters but still provides
redundancy or failover at the remote site. He mentions that he is concerned that the FTP
traffic might impact the VoIP traffic. He wants to choose a site to implement a test before
implementing UC at all sites.
Scenario Two Questions
The following questions/directives refer to scenario two:
1. What are the business requirements for Big Oil and Gas?
2. Are there any business-cost constraints?
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search