Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Acknowledgments This work was supported by several projects, including the European
Regional Development Fund in the IT4Innovations Centre of Excellence project (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/
02. 0070), Development of human resources in research and development of latest soft computing
methods and their application in practice project (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0072) funded by Operational
Programme Education for Competitiveness, co-financed by ESF and state budget of the Czech
Republic, the European Community
'
s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007
-
2013) under
grant agreement no. 218086 and the Latvia-Lithuania cross border cooperation programme project
Cross-border DISCOS (JRTC Extension in Area of Development of Distributed Real-Time Signal
Processing and Control Systems, code: LLIV-215).
References
1. Kuchler S, Mahl T, Neupert J, Schneider K, Sawodny O (2010) Active control for an offshore
crane using prediction of the vessel
309
2. Sawodny O, Kuchler S (2010) Nonlinear control of an active heave compensation system with
time-delay. In: International conference on control applications, pp 1313
'
s motion. Trans Mechatron 16(2):297
-
1318
3. Wenlin Y, Zhuying Z, Aiqun Z (2008) Research on an active heave compensation system for
remotely operated vehicle. In: International conference on intelligent computation technology
and automation, pp 407
-
410
4. Sarker G, Myers G, Williams T, Goldberg D (2006) Comparison of heave-motion
compensation systems on scienti
c ocean drilling ship and their effects on wireline logging
data. In: Proceeding of offshore technology conference
5. Adamson JE (2003) Ef
cient heave motion compensation for cable-suspended systems. In:
Underwater Intervention
6. Huster A, Bergstrom H, Gosior J, White D (2009) Design and operational performance of a
standalone passive heave compensation system for a work class ROV. In: Proceeding of
oceans, MTS/IEEE Biloxi
-
Marine technology for our future global and local challenges
7. Trucco A, Garofalo M (2009) Processing and analysis of underwater acoustic images generated
by mechanically scanned sonar systems. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58(7):2061
—
2071
8. Teixeira FC, Aguiar AP, Pascoal A (2010) Nonlinear adaptive control of an underwater towed
vehicle. Ocean Eng 37:1193
-
1220
9. Chang Y-C, Hsu S-K, Tsai C-H (2010) Sidescan sonar image processing: correcting
brightness variation and patching gaps. J Mar Sci Technol 18(6):785
-
789
10. Brown CJ, Sameoto JA, Smith SJ (2012) Multiple methods, maps, and management
applications: purpose made sea
-
13
11. Masetti G, Calder B (2012) Remote identi
cation of a shipwreck site from MBES backscatter.
J Environ Manag 111:44
-
52
12. Andziulis A, Gaigals G, Lenkauskas T, Visakavi
č
ius E, Jakovlev S, Eglynas T, Beniu
š
is V
(2011) Comparison of two image processing techniques for objects detection on the sea floor.
In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference. Transport means, pp. 62
-
64. ISSN:1822-
296X
13. Peterson RS, Nguyen TC, Rodriguez RR (1994) Motion minimization of AUVs for improved
imaging sensor performance beneath a seaway.
fl
oor maps in support of ocean management. J Sea Res 72:1
-
In: Autonomous underwater vehicle
254
14. Barrass B (2001) Ship stability notes and examples. Butterworth-Heinemann, London
15. Buckham B, Nahon M, Seto M, Zhao X, Lambert C (2003) Dynamics and control of a towed
underwater vehicle system, part I: model development. Ocean Eng 30:453
technology, pp 247
-
470
-
Search WWH ::
Custom Search