Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
The combined evaluation of both-way accessibility discovers areas (i.e. Klatovy
district) where almost no municipality has a possibility for suitable both-way
commuting for the 2nd work shift. It may be a serious problem for some occu-
pations (mainly in service sector such as shop assistants). As expected, better
conditions for 3rd work shift are around big cities, nevertheless important differ-
ences in the size of such agglomerations exist. The largest accessible agglomeration
is around Ostrava and in the SE Moravia, while the Plze
ň
agglomeration (4th
largest city) remains quite small.
The development of accessibility in 5 years (2007
2011) in the Czech NUTS3
regions indicates the divergent situation of Prague, the Moravian-Silesian and Zlin
regions compared to quite stable worse situation in other regions.
-
Acknowledgments The data and the transport searching engine are provided by courtesy of
CHAPS Ltd. Application has been developed as a part of Higher Education Development Fund
—
FRV
Š
956/2013/B1.
References
1. Geurs KT, Ritsema van Eck JR (2001) Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM
Report 408505 006. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment
2. Vanderbulcke G, Steenberghen T, Thomas I (2009) Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool
for land-use and transport planning? J Transp Geogr 17(1):39
-
53
3. Geurs K, Wee B (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review
and research directions. J Transp Geogr 12(2):127
-
140
4. Ivan I (2010) Doch
á
zka na zast
á
vku a jej
í
vliv na doj
ížď
ku do zam
ě
stn
á
n
í
. Geograe 115
(4):393
-
412. ISSN:1212-0014
5. Hagerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? People Reg Sci Assoc 24
(1):7
21
6. Cebollada A (2009) Mobility and labour market exclusion in the Barcelona metropolitan
region. J Transp Geogr 17(3):226
-
233
-
7. H
ů
rsk
ý
J (1978) Regionalizace
Č
esk
é
socialistick
é
republiky na z
á
klad
ě
sp
á
du osobn
í
dopravy. Studia Geographica, Geogra
ck
ýú
stav
Č
SAV, Brno, p 182
8. Marada M, Kv
ě
to
ň
V, Vondr
áč
kov
á
P (2010) Doprava a geogra
ck
á
organizace spole
č
nosti
v
Č
esku.
Č
esk
á
geogra
ck
á
spole
č
nost, Geographica. Praha, p 165
9. Kri
ž
an F (2007) Region
á
lna
typol
ó
gia
ú
zemia Bratislavy na
z
á
klade dostupnosti
385
10. Currie G (2010) Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs.
J Transp Geogr 18:31
-
41
11. Yigitcanlar T, Sipe N, Evans R, Pitot M (2007) A GIS-based land use and public transport
accessibility indexing model. Aust Plan 44(3):30
-
37
12. Goodchild MF, Jannele DG (2004) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, p 456. ISBN:0-19-515270-0
13.
Š
ed
ě
nkov
á
M, Hor
á
k J, Ivan I, Fojt
í
k D (2009) Hodnocen
í
rozd
í
l
ů
p
ř
i sledov
á
n
í
doj
ížď
ky do
zam
supermarketov a hypermarketov. Geogra
ck
ý č
asopis 59(4):373
-
ě
stn
á
n
í
jedn
í
m
č
iob
ě
ma sm
ě
ry. In: Proc. Sympozium GIS Ostrava 2009, Ostrava, p 13
14. Ivan I, Hor
M (2009) Public transport accessibility in the Czech Republic. In:
Proceedings of ERSA congress, Lodz, Poland, p 18, 25
á
kJ,
Š
ed
ě
nkov
á
29 Aug 2009
15. Transport Yearbook (2011) Ministry of transportation, Prague.
https://www.sydos.cz/cs/
-
Search WWH ::
Custom Search