Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Im{
s
}
x
(
t
) = e
−
at
u
(
t
)
t
Re{
s
}
0
−
a
0
(a)
(b)
Example 6.1 shows that the bilateral Laplace transform of the decaying expo-
nential function
x
(
t
)
=
e
Fig. 6.1. (a) Exponential
decaying function
x
(
t
) = e
−
at
u
(
t
); (b) its
associated ROC, Re{
s
> −
a
,
over which the bilateral Laplace
transform exists.
−
at
u
(
t
) will converge to a finite value
X
(
s
)
=
1
/
(
s
+
a
)
within the ROC (Re
{
s
> −
a
). In other words, the bilateral Laplace transform
of
x
(
t
)
=
e
−
at
u
(
t
) exists for all values of
a
within the specified ROC. No restric-
tion is imposed on the value of
a
for the existence of the Laplace transform.
On the other hand, the CTFT of the decaying exponential function exists only
for
a
>
0. For
a
<
0, the exponential function
x
(
t
)
=
e
−
at
u
(
t
) is not absolutely
integrable, and hence its CTFT does not exist. This is an important distinction
between the CTFT and the bilateral Laplace transform. The CTFT exists for a
limited number of absolutely integrable functions. By associating an ROC with
the bilateral Laplace transform, we can evaluate the Laplace transform for a
much larger set of functions.
Example 6.2
Calculate the bilateral Laplace transform of the non-causal exponential function
g
(
t
)
=−
e
−
at
u
(
−
t
).
Solution
Substituting
g
(
t
)
=−
e
−
at
u
(
−
t
) in Eq. (6.5), we obtain
0
−∞
∞
0
1
(
s
+
a
)
e
−
(
s
+
a
)
t
−
e
−
at
u
(
−
t
)e
−
st
d
t
=−
e
−
(
s
+
a
)
t
d
t
=
G
(
s
)
=
.
−∞
−∞
At the upper limit,
t
→
0, e
−
(
s
+
a
)
t
=
1. At the lower limit,
t
→−∞
,e
−
(
s
+
a
)
t
is finite only if Re
{
s
+
a
<
0, where it equals zero. The bilateral Laplace
transform is therefore given by
1
(
s
+
a
)
for Re
s
< −
a
G
(
s
)
=
undefined
for Re
s
≥−
a
.
Figure 6.2 illustrates the ROC, Re
s
< −
a
, for the bilateral Laplace transform
of
g
(
t
)
=−
e
−
at
u
(
−
t
).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search