Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 3.13. Solution
y
(
t
) for
Example 3.13 computed using
M
ATLAB
.
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
−0.5
−1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
time
The solution
y
(
t
) is plotted in Fig. 3.13. It can be easily verified that the
plot is same as the analytical solution given by Eq. (C.38), which is reproduced
below
y
(
t
)
=
1
+
21
+
9
34
cos
t
+
15
−
t
−
4
t
2
e
17
e
34
sin
t
for
t
≥
0
.
3.9 Summary
In Chapter 3, we developed analytical techniques for LTIC systems. We saw
that the output signal
y
(
t
) of an LTIC system can be evaluated analytically in
the time domain using two different methods. In Section 3.1, we determined the
output of an LTIC by solving a linear, constant-coefficient differential equation.
The solution of such a differential equation can be expressed as a sum of
two components: zero-input response and zero-state response. The zero-input
response is the output produced by the LTIC system because of the initial
conditions. For stable LTIC systems, the zero-input response decays to zero
with increasing time. The zero-state response is due to the input signal. The
overall output of the LTIC system is the sum of the zero-input response and
zero-state response.
An alternative representation for determining the output of an LTIC system
is based on the impulse response of the system. In Section 3.3, we defined the
impulse response
h
(
t
) as the output of an LTIC system when a unit impulse
δ
(
t
)
is applied at the input of the system. In Section 3.4, we proved that the output
y
(
t
)
of an LTIC system can be obtained by convolving the input signal
x
(
t
) with its
impulse response
h
(
t
). The resulting convolution integral can either be solved
analytically or by using a graphical approach. The graphical approach was
illustrated through several examples in Section 3.5. The convolution integral
Search WWH ::
Custom Search