Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Taung on his old colleagues—not to mention the rest of the world.
Dart dispatched his report to
Nature
in time to catch the mailboat
to England on January 6, 1925, and it reached the editor's desk by Janu-
got the best of him, and he confided to Mr. Paver, the news editor of the
Johannesburg
Star,
that he might “have something of worldwide signifi-
explained, “Paver's long, wistful look mixed with my own pride
—or
vanity
—
and an overwhelming impulse to confide in somebody who
After Paver promised that nothing would appear in the
Star
until
Nature
published the report, Dart gave him a full account of the discovery and
photographs.
Dart believed that the report would be published in
Nature
near the
was prepared in advance for the
Star.
As the date approached, the
Star
learned that, because the discovery was so unprecedented,
Nature
had
referred the report to experts in England to seek opinions on whether
or not it should be published. (Although it may not have been so then,
this review process by academic peers is standard practice today at
Nature
and other high-caliber science journals.) Paver, with Dart's bless-
ing, informed
Nature
that the
Star
intended to release the story in the
evening paper of February 3. (This would not be a successful ploy today,
because
Nature
has very strict rules about “embargoing” reports of other
media until the articles have been published in the journal.)
Nature,
nonetheless, delayed publication until February 7, and the
Star
pub-
lished a phenomenal scoop on February 3, which was picked up the next
morning by newspapers around the globe. That happened to be Dart's
Although Dart worried about the reception Taung might receive, he
clearly had not been
that
worried. Perhaps he thought his assessment of