Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
22. Dart with Craig 1959, 42.
23. Smith 1925b.
24. Dart 1925c.
25. Keith 1925b.
26. Tobias 2005.
27. Dart with Craig 1959, 51.
28. Barlow 1925.
29. Spencer 1990a, xix.
30. Dart 1925a.
31. Keith 1925a, 234.
32. Dart 1929.
33. By the time Elliot Smith informed Dart about the rejection of his mono-
graph, the former had known about it for around seven months, as indicated by
a rejection letter of July 4, 1930, from the Royal Society to Elliot Smith, in the
Raymond Dart Papers, University of Witwatersrand Archives.
34. Dart with Craig 1959, 52.
35. Smith 1931.
36. Dart 1933.
37. Dart 1934.
38. Broom 1950, 27.
39. Tobias 1996, 51.
40. In making his case, Tobias cited the molecular geneticist Gunther Stent's
theory about premature discoveries (Stent 1972).
41. Tobias 1996, 57.
42. Tobias 1996, 57.
43. Excerpt (punctuation uncorrected) from a letter to Professor Dart (signa-
ture illegible), February 7, 1925, Grand Hotel-Paris, the Raymond Dart Papers,
University of Witwatersrand Archives.
44. “Denies Monkey Ancestors, Pulpit Cold Water on Missing Link,”
Rand
Daily Mail,
February 9, 1925, the Raymond Dart Papers, University of Witwa-
tersrand Archives.
45. “Man and His Origin, Christianity and Evolution, Bishop Talbot on the
Taungs Skull,” the
Star
( Johannesburg), February 19, 1925, the Raymond Dart
Papers, University of Witwatersrand Archives.
46. Ibid.
47. “The Taungs Skull, Theologians' Problem, Bishop Barnes on Man's Prog-
ress,” the
Star
( Johannesburg), February 21, 1925, the Raymond Dart Papers, Uni-
versity of Witwatersrand Archives.
