Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Calderon Diaz, J.A., Fahey, A.G., Kilbride, A.L., Green, L.E. and Boyle, L.A., 2013. Longitudinal
study of the effect of rubber slat mats on locomotory ability, body, limb and claw lesions, and
dirtiness of group housed sows. Journal of Animal Science 91(8): 3940-3954.
Cassar, G., Kirkwood, R.N., Seguin, M.J., Widowski, T.M., Farzan, A., Zanella, A.J. and Friendship,
R.J., 2008. Influence of stage of gestation at grouping and presence of boars on farrowing rate
and litter size of group-housed sows. Journal of Swine Health and Production 16: 81-85.
Caulfield, M.P. and Cambridge, H., 2008. The questionable value of some science-based 'welfare'
assessments in intensive animal farming: sow stalls as an illustrative example. Australian
Veterinary Journal 86: 446-448.
Chapinal, N., Ruiz de la Torre, J.L., Cerisuelo, A., Gasa, J., Baucells, M.D., Coma, J., Vidal, A. and
Manteca, X., 2010. Evaluation of welfare and productivity in pregnant sows kept in stalls or in
2 different group housing systems. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and
Research 5: 82-93.
Chapinal, N., Ruiz-de-la-Torre, J.L., Cerisuelo, A., Baucells, M.D., Gasa, J. and Manteca, X., 2008.
Feeder use patterns in group-housed pregnant sows fed with an unprotected electronic sow
feeder (Fitmix). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11: 319-336.
Couret, D., Otten, W., Puppe, B., Prunier, A. and Merlot, E., 2009. Behavioural, endocrine and
immune responses to repeated social stress in pregnant gilts. Animal 3: 118-127.
Csermely, D., 1989. Feeding behaviour in pregnant sows of different social rank. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science 22: 84-85.
Docking, C.M., Kay, R.M., Whittaker, X., Burfoot, A. and Day, J.E.L., 2000. The effects of stocking
density and pen shape on the behaviour, incidence of aggression and subsequent skin damage
of sows mixed in a specialised mixing pen. Winter Meeting of the British Society of Animal
Science. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, p. 32.
Edwards, S.A., 2000. Alternative housing for dry sows: system studies or components analyses?
Proceedings of the 51
st
annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production.
August 21-24, 2000. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp.
99-107.
Edwards, S.A. and Riley, J.E., 1986. The application of the electronic identification and computerized
feed dispensing system in dry sow housing. Pig News and Information 7: 295-298.
Ehlorsson, C.J., Olsson, O. and Lundeheim, N., 2003. Prophylactic measures for improving claw
health in dry sows. Svensk Veterinärtidning 13: 11-20.
Elmore, M.R.P., Garner, J.P., Johnson, A.K., Richert, B.T. and Pajor, E.A., 2010. A flooring
comparison: the impact of rubber mats on the health, behavior, and welfare of group-housed
sows at breeding. Applied animal behaviour science 123(1-2): 7-15.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2005. The welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effects of
different space allowances and floor types. The EFSA Journal 268: 1-19.
European Union (EU), 2008. Minimum standards for the protections of pigs. Council Directive
2008/120/EC. Available at:
http://tinyurl.com/mf9ew2s
.
Foxcroft, G.R., 1997: Mechanisms mediating nutritional effects on embryonic survival in pigs.
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 52: 47-61.
Fraser, D. 2003. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and
values. Animal Welfare 12: 433-443.
Geudeke, M.J. and Gerritsen, C. 2004. Epidemic of early disruption of pregnancy in Dutch sow
herds: risk factors on farm level. Proceedings of the 18
th
IPVS Congress, Hamburg, Germany,
pp. 850.
