Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
the mathematical assessment of lifetime performance. Others include only gilts selected
out of the finishing barn; and still others use only gilts added to the breeding pool. Fifthly,
rearing management (nursing litter size, neonatal disease, space provision), and not
nutrition or genetics, contribute to the experiences and responses of developing gilts
and possibly to their subsequent reproductive performance (Flowers, 2005). Lastly, work
assessing lifetime performance of swine can be confusing because of differences is culling
criteria and the subjective judgments used for some reasons of removal. Pinilla et al.
(2013) stated that 'Gilt performance and lifetime productivity are the expression of a
sound synergy between health practices, feeding/nutrition, and production principles.
Our understanding of the importance of body condition in gilt development has
increased, but a number of aspects are yet unexplored and need refining.
References
Aherne, F. 2005. Feeding the gestating sow. Pork Information Gateway Factsheet PIG 07-01-06.
Available at: www.extension.org/pages/27438/feeding-the-gestating-sow#.
Amaral Filha, W.S., Bernardi, M.L., Wentz, I. and Bortolozzo, F.P., 2009. Growth rate and age at
boar exposure as factors influencing gilt puberty. Livestock Science 120: 51-57.
Amaral Filha, W.S., Bernardi, M.L., Wentz, I. and Bortolozzo, F.P., 2010. Reproductive performance
of gilts according to growth rate and backfat thickness at mating. Animal Reproduction
Science 121: 139-144.
Beltranena, E., Aherne, F.X. and Foxcroft, G.R., 1993. Innate variability in sexual development
irrespective of body fatness in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 71: 471-480.
Beltranena, E., Aherne, F.X., Foxcroft, G.R. and Kirkwood, R.N., 1991. Effects of pre- and
postpubertal feeding on production traits at first and second estrus in gilts. Journal of Animal
Science 69: 886-893.
Bortolozzo, F.P., Bernardi, M.L., Kummer, R. and Wentz, I., 2009. Growth, body state and breeding
performance in gilts and primiparous sows. Society for Reproduction and Fertility Supplement
66: 281-91.
Bussières, D. 2013. Impact of gilt breeding condition on lifetime productivity and performance.
Benchmark 8 th edition, PigCHAMP and Benchmark.Farms.Com , Ames, IA, USA. Available
at: http://benchmark.farms.com/2013_Impact_of_Gilt_Breeding.html .
Clowes, E.J., Aherne, F.X., Foxcroft, G.R. and Baracos, V.E., 2003a. Selective protein loss in
lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. Journal of Animal
Science 81: 753-764.
Clowes, E.J., Aherne, F.X., Schaefer, A.L., Foxcroft, G.R. and Baracos, V.E., 2003b. Parturition
body size and body protein loss during lactation influence performance during lactation and
ovarian function at weaning in first parity sows. Journal of Animal Science 81: 1517-1528.
De Koning, D.B., Van Grevenhof, E.M., Laurenssen, B.F.A., Van Weeren, P.R., Hazeleger, W.
and Kemp, B., 2013. The influence of dietary restriction before and after 10 weeks of age on
osteochondrosis in growing gilts. Journal of Animal Science 91: 5167-5176.
Flowers, W.L., 2005. New ideas about gilt development and management. North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 11 pp. Available at: www.prairieswine.com/pdf/2225.pdf .
Foxcroft, G. and Aherne, F., 2001. Rethinking management of the replacement gilt. Advances in
Pork Production 12: 197-210.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search