An Efficient Accurate Shock-capturing Scheme for Modeling Water Hammer Flows - Advances in Control and Automation of Water Systems - page 102

tABle 6.3 (Continued)

(b)

No. of From To Length

Pipe Points Point Point (m)

P18 2 P18:J18 P18:J19 14.6

P19 2 P19:J19 P19:J20 12.0

P20 32 P20:J20 P20:J21 499.0

P21 17 P21:J21 P21:J22 243.4

P22 11 P22:J22 P22:J23 156.0

P23 3 P23:J23 P23:J24 22.0

P24 6 P24:J24 P24:J28 82.0

P25 4 P25:J28 P25:N1 35.6

P0 2 P0:J1 P0:J2 .5

P1 2 P1:J2 P1:J3 .5

tABle 6.4 Pipe information created by Hammer--Version 07.00.049.00 (Snapshot for
selected end points at time 4.9885 s) compared to equation of Regression software.
LENGTH DIAMETER WAVESPEED D-W CHECK

LABEL (m) (mm) (m /s) FR. COEF. VALVE

P2 60.7 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P3 311.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P4 1.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.027 *

P5 0.5 1200.00 1084.0 0.027 *

P6 108.7 1200.00 1084.0 0.067 *

P7 21.5 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P8 15.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P9 340.7 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P10 207.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P11 339.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P12 328.6 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P13 47.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P14 590.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P15 49.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P16 224.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P17 18.4 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P18 14.6 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P19 12.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P20 499.0 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *

P21 243.4 1200.00 1084.0 0.028 *