Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
only consider the last two terms on the right-hand side (i.e., we do not take
into account changes of the point coordinates). Omitting all subscripts and
introducing the auxiliary quantities of (5-92), we immediately get
∆
α
=cot
z
sin
α
∆
ϕ
+(sin
ϕ
−
cos
α
cos
ϕ
cot
z
)∆
λ
(5-95)
or, using ∆
ϕ
=
ξ
and ∆
λ
cos
ϕ
=
η
, yields
∆
α
=
ξ
sin
α
cot
z
+sin
ϕ
∆
λ
−
η
cos
α
cot
z.
(5-96)
This equation may be rearranged to
∆
α
=sin
ϕ
∆
λ
+(
ξ
sin
α
−
η
cos
α
)cot
z.
(5-97)
Alternatively, by using ∆
λ
=
η/
cos
ϕ
,weget
∆
α
=
η
tan
ϕ
+(
ξ
sin
α
−
η
cos
α
)cot
z.
(5-98)
In first-order triangulation, the lines of sight are usually almost horizontal
so that
z
.
=90
◦
,cot
z
= 0. Therefore, the corresponding term can in general
be neglected and we get
∆
α
=
η
tan
ϕ
=∆
λ
sin
ϕ.
(5-99)
This is
Laplace's equation
in its usual simplified form. It is remarkable that
the differences ∆
α
=
A
λ
should be related in such a
simple way. Laplace's equation is fundamental for the classical astrogeodetic
computation of triangulations (Sect. 5.14).
For later reference we note that the total deflection of the vertical - that
is, the angle
ϑ
between the actual plumb line and the ellipsoidal normal - is
given by
−
α
and ∆
λ
=Λ
−
ϑ
=
ξ
2
+
η
2
(5-100)
and that the deflection component
ε
in the direction of the azimuth
α
is
ε
=
ξ
cos
α
+
η
sin
α.
(5-101)
It is clear that
ϑ
in (5-100) has nothing to do with the two different
ϑ
used for spherical and ellipsoidal-harmonic coordinates (polar distances).
Returning to the reduction of astronomical to the corresponding ellip-
soidal quantities, we have (5-94) for the reduction of Φ
,
Λ
,H
to
ϕ, λ, h
and,
finally, the formula
α
=
A − η
tan
ϕ
(5-102)
reduces the astronomical azimuth
A
to the ellipsoidal azimuth
α
.
For the application of these formulas, we need the geoidal undulation
N
and the deflection components
ξ
and
η
with respect to the reference ellipsoid
used. Two points should be noted: