Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
G
N
N
Table 5.
Comparisons on
between h-NSA and t-NSA when fixing
and varying
M
R
S
N
Max
G
Min
AVG
G
STDDEV
S
M
M
G
M
h-NSA
5000
5000
5000.0
0
50
t-NSA
5686
5252
5426.8
151.14
h-NSA
10000
10000
10000.0
0
100
t-NSA
12434
11360
11716.2
344.96
h-NSA
20383
20000
20107.3
148.86
200
t-NSA
30275
26272
28499.5
1365.31
h-NSA
32055
30527
31052.8
448.16
300
t-NSA
56718
44809
49433.9
3574.93
h-NSA
44248
40796
42513.5
979.37
400
t-NSA
95220
73279
81900.0
6532.52
h-NSA
58264
53215
55599.7
1324.18
500
t-NSA
145005
120985
129361.7
7175.92
h-NSA
71615
65516
68209.4
1916.98
600
t-NSA
212944
168734
187648.0
13928.35
h-NSA
88921
78691
82592.2
3309.34
700
t-NSA
332533
225637
275329.4
33571.90
h-NSA
119346
111265
115244.9
3135.51
900
t-NSA
688482
471133
562326.6
75176.57
h-NSA
165563
135428
151418.2
9687.97
1100
t-NSA
1199136
969823
1124476.0
69780.24
12
0.9
h-NSA
t-NSA
0.8
10
0.7
H-NSA
T-NSA
8
0.6
0.5
6
0.4
4
0.3
0.2
2
0.1
0
0
50
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
900 1100
50
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
900 1100
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5.
(a)Comparisons on
C
between h-NSA and t-NSA when fixing
N
and varying
N
;
R
S
C
N
N
(b) Standard deviation of
between h-NSA and t-NSA when fixing
and varying
R
S
C
of both h-NSA and t-NSA
increase with the increment of
N
. However, the average matching numbers for gener-
ating one matured detector in h-NSA is much less than in t-NSA, especially when
From Table 5 and Fig. 5, when the
N
is fixed, the
R
G
N
S
is large. And the increasing speed of
C
in t-NSA is much higher than in h-NSA.
G
