Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
We will refer to the elements of
S
p
as
vectors
.The
Hamming distance
between
the vectors
x, y
∈
S
p
is
|{
i
∈
[
n
]:
x
i
=
y
i
}|
and is denoted by
d
(
x, y
). Let
r
≥
1 be an integer. Two vectors
x, y
∈
S
p
are said to be
r
-intersecting
if
d
(
x, y
)
r
. (This term originates in the observation that if we represent
a vector
x
=(
x
1
,...,x
n
)
≤
n
−
∈
S
p
by the set
{
(
i, x
i
):
i
∈
[
n
]
}
, then
x
and
y
S
p
are
r
-intersecting if and only if the sets representing them have at least
r
common elements.) Two families
A, B
∈
ↆ
S
p
are
r
-cross-intersecting
,ifevery
pair
x
B
is
r
-intersecting. If (
A, A
)isan
r
-cross-intersecting pair, we
say
A
is
r
-intersecting
. We simply say
intersecting
or
cross-intersecting
to mean
1-intersecting or 1-cross-intersecting, respectively.
The investigation of the maximum value for
∈
A
,
y
∈
|
A
|·|
B
|
for cross-intersecting
pairs of families
A, B
S
p
was initiated by Moon [
Mo82
]. She proved, using a
clever induction argument, that in the special case when
p
1
=
p
2
=
ↆ
···
=
p
n
=
k
for some
k
≥
3, every cross-intersecting pair
A, B
ↆ
S
p
satisfies
k
2
n−
2
,
|
A
|·|
B
|≤
with equality if and only if
A
=
B
=
{
x
∈
S
p
:
x
i
=
j
}
, for some
i
∈
[
n
]and
j
[
k
]. In the case
A
=
B
, Moon's theorem had been discovered by
Berge [
Be74
], Livingston [
Liv79
], and Borg [
Bo08
]. See also Stanton [
St80
]. In his
report on Livingston's paper, published in the
Mathematical Reviews
, Kleitman
gave an extremely short proof for the case
A
=
B
, based on a shifting argument.
Zhang [
Zh13
] established a somewhat weaker result, using a generalization of
Katona's circle method [
K72
]. Note that for
k
= 2, we can take
A
=
B
to be
any family of 2
n−
1
vectors without containing a pair (
x
1
,...,x
n
)
,
(
y
1
,...,y
n
)
with
x
i
+
y
i
=3forevery
i
. Then
A
is an intersecting family with
∈
2
=2
2
n−
2
,
|
A
|
which is not of the type described in Moon's theorem.
Moon also considered
r
-cross-intersecting pairs in
S
p
with
p
1
=
p
2
=
···
=
p
n
=
k
for some
k>r
+ 1, and characterized all pairs for which
|
A
|·|
B
|
attains
its maximum, that is, we have
=
k
2(
n−r
)
.
|
A
|·|
B
|
The assumption
k>r
+ 1 is necessary. See Tokushige [
To13
], for a somewhat
weaker result, using algebraic techniques.
Zhang [
Zh13
] suggested that Moon's results may be extended to arbitrary
sequences of positive integers
p
=(
p
1
,...,p
n
). The aim of this note is twofold:
(1) to establish such an extension under the assumption min
i
p
i
>r
+ 1, and (2)
to formulate a conjecture that covers essentially all other interesting cases. We
verify this conjecture in several special cases.
We start with the case
r
= 1, which has also been settled by Borg [
Bo14
],
using different techniques.
Theorem 1.
Let
p
=(
p
1
,...,p
n
)
be a sequence positive integers and let
A, B
ↆ
S
p
form a pair of cross-intersecting families of vectors.
We have
2
/k
2
,where
k
= min
i
p
i
. Equality holds for the case
|
A
|·|
B
|≤|
S
p
|
A
=
B
=
{
x
∈
S
p
:
x
i
=
j
}
, whenever
i
∈
[
n
]
satisfies
p
i
=
k
and
j
∈
[
k
]
.For
k
=2
, there are no other extremal cross-intersecting families.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search