Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
be equal to the R TX value of 1 from run 2, and so on. To carry out the least
squares fit, we put the observations from the table into the coded input matrix
( X ) and response vectors ( y eyeH and y eyeW ). Note that the eye height and width
are expressed in units of mV and ps, respectively.
1
x 1 , 1
x 2 , 1
···
x 20 , 1
1
x 1 , 2
x 2 , 2
···
x 20 , 2
X
=
(14-8)
.
.
.
.
. . .
1
x 1 , 28
x 2 , 28
···
x 20 , 28
With the observations in matrix form, application of the model fitting equations
= ( X T X ) 1 X T y eyeH
b eyeH
(14-9)
= ( X T X ) 1 X T y eyeW
b eyeW
(14-10)
gives the estimated fit coefficient vectors:
95 . 51799
2 . 32444
0 . 12056
9 . 55222
89 . 10651
1 . 94444
0 . 55556
0 . 44444
30 . 81556
10 . 83333
0 . 28778
0 . 18751
7 . 05556
0 . 13314
2 . 18063
0 . 56250
0 . 36686
1 . 18750
1 . 19749
1 . 26063
b eyeH
=
2 . 43813
b eyeW
=
1 . 56250
0 . 36686
0 . 44249
3 . 88563
1 . 93750
0 . 56250
0 . 31250
0 . 02937
4 . 43812
2 . 97249
4 . 13314
1 . 77437
0 . 22937
1 . 56250
1 . 43750
2 . 11688
0 . 56250
20 . 42063
8 . 93750
14 . 61249
8 . 13314
Before proceeding further, it makes sense that we should apply the estimated
fit coefficients, b eyeH and b eyeW , to the input observed using equation (14-6) to
obtain estimates of the response. These estimates are shown in columns (9) and
(10) of Table 14-3. Comparing the predicted and observed responses, we see that
our models agree to within approximately
±
4mVand
±
4 ps.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search