Geology Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 7.7 Hourly reference evapotranspiration comparison between the FAO56 Penman equation
(FAO56-PM ET
0
) and the standardized CIMIS Penman
Monteith equation (CIMIS-PM ET
0
) for
-
the Brue catchment during the years 1995
1999
-
Fig. 7.8 Hourly reference evapotranspiration comparison between the FAO56 Penman equation
(FAO56-PM ET
0
) and the COPAIS approach empirical equation (ASCE-PM ET
0
) for the Brue
catchment during the years 1995
1999
-
The 5-year mean values of slope, R
2
, and RMSD between CIMIS ET
0
and
FAO56
PM ET
0
are 1.058, 0.99, and 0.0062 mm h
−
1
, respectively. Even though
the slopes of those plots are higher than a 1:1 ratio, the CIMIS Penman equation
keeps a very good linear relation with the standardized Penman
-
Monteith equa-
tions. In the case of CIMIS-PM, the 5-year mean values of slope, R
2
, and RMSD in
-