Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
c
p
=0.09 g/L
c
HCl
= 10
−3
M
c
HCl
, mol/L
c
p
, g/L
10
− 4
0.09
10
−3
0.19
10
−2
0.38
10
−1
0.75
10
−
1
10
0
10
1
10
2
10
−
1
10
0
10
1
10
2
τ
/ ms
Fig. 8
Relaxation time distributions for PS-PVP-PEO solutions in HCl aqueous solutions, mea-
sured (
left
) at the copolymer concentration,
c
p
,of0.09gL
−
1
and HCl concentrations of 10
−
4
,
10
−
3
,10
−
2
and 10
−
1
mol L
−
1
;and(
right
)in10
−
3
M HCl, with copolymer concentrations of 0.09,
0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 g L
−
1
Fig. 9
Hydrodynamic radius,
R
H
, of PS-PVP-PEO
micelles in acidic aqueous
solutions, as a function of pH
31
30
29
28
1
2
3
4
pH
of particles and the balance between individual micelles and aggregates shifts in
favor of aggregates with (a) increasing concentration of HCl and (b) increasing
copolymer concentration.
A strong effect of electrostatic screening is evident from the dependence of the
and the screening are negligible and
R
H
increases with decreasing pH due to sub-
stantial protonization of PVP blocks. The maximum
R
H
is reached at around pH 3.
Below this pH value, a decrease in
R
H
is observed due to electrostatic screening by
an increasing concentration of small ions.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search