Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
c p =0.09 g/L
c HCl = 10 −3 M
c HCl , mol/L
c p , g/L
10 − 4
0.09
10 −3
0.19
10 −2
0.38
10 −1
0.75
10 1
10 0
10 1
10 2
10 1
10 0
10 1
10 2
τ
/ ms
Fig. 8 Relaxation time distributions for PS-PVP-PEO solutions in HCl aqueous solutions, mea-
sured ( left ) at the copolymer concentration, c p ,of0.09gL 1 and HCl concentrations of 10 4 ,
10 3 ,10 2 and 10 1 mol L 1 ;and( right )in10 3 M HCl, with copolymer concentrations of 0.09,
0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 g L 1
Fig. 9 Hydrodynamic radius,
R H , of PS-PVP-PEO
micelles in acidic aqueous
solutions, as a function of pH
31
30
29
28
1
2
3
4
pH
of particles and the balance between individual micelles and aggregates shifts in
favor of aggregates with (a) increasing concentration of HCl and (b) increasing
copolymer concentration.
A strong effect of electrostatic screening is evident from the dependence of the
size of micelles on pH (Fig. 9 ) . In the pH range above 3, the concentration of ions
and the screening are negligible and R H increases with decreasing pH due to sub-
stantial protonization of PVP blocks. The maximum R H is reached at around pH 3.
Below this pH value, a decrease in R H is observed due to electrostatic screening by
an increasing concentration of small ions.
 
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search