Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 9: Percentage accuracy for map reasoning task
Contrast
Significance
Difference
+/- limits
Cho - Dot
*
-1,14254
1,06536
Cho - Prop
-0,625525
1,0746
Dot - Prop
0,517011
1,08039
Table 3: LSD mulltiple range test for total direct acquisition answers
Gathering together the map usage and map preference indices, it is possi-
ble to measure the percentage accuracy for their matching ( Figure 10 ).
Matching proportional maps preference/usage did not repeat the results for
the direct acquisition task and there was no evidence to support the idea of
a better performance being linked to an analysis made with the support of
the desirable map. According to the LSD test, there are no significant dif-
ferences between all nine different combinations.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search