Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
3.2 National Statistics
Before the findings of the tests of association between development statis-
tics and map symbologies are interpreted,
Tables 5 to 12
below present the
statistically significant results from the analysis. In these tables, a result in
plain type indicates that the result meets the 0.05 significance level and
bold type means the result meets the 0.01 significance level (using two-
tailed tests).
Table 5:
Significant correlations between development statistics and symbol counts for
Level I and Level II feature types using Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient
Table 6:
Significant correlations between development statistics and symbol counts for
Level I and Level II feature types using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient
Table 7:
Significant correlations between development statistics and Level I and Level II
feature types as a percentage of total symbology using Pearson's product moment corre-
lation coefficient
