Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 7.5
Mean aperture of a discontinuity as a function of normal stress and shear displacement
(Erichsen 1987)
Using (6.19) and (7.8) the permeability of a discontinuity as a function of
σ
n
and
δ
s,D
can be expressed as
(7.9)
Erichsen (1987) used the approach of Erban (1986) to calculate
δ
n,D
(
δ
s,D
) in the pre-peak
zone I (
δ
s,D
≤
δ
p,D
) and in the post-peak zone II (
δ
s,D
>
δ
p,D
), respectively, where
δ
p,D
is the shear displacement at failure (Fig. 3.21). In the pre-peak zone I (
δ
s,D
≤
δ
p,D
) the
δ
n,D
-
δ
s,D
relationship (Fig. 3.21) is:
if
δ
s,D
≤
δ
p,D
(7.10)
where
is a parameter describing dilatancy and i is the sliding-up angle. In the post-
peak zone II (
ψ
δ
s,D
>
δ
p,D
) the relationship between
δ
n,D
and
δ
s,D
is:
if
δ
s,D
>
δ
p,D
, (7.11)
where
is the so-called “softening parameter” describing strength reduction in the post-
peak zone II (Fig. 3.21). The negative sign of
χ
δ
n,D
indicates dilatant displacements dur-
ing shearing leading to an increase in aperture (Figs. 3.21 and 7.5).
Alternative formulations for the stress-dependent permeability of discontinuities can be
found, for example, in Olsson & Barton (2001).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search