Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(7.2) realistically describes the velocity profile in the surface layer and allows cal-
culating
u
T
∼
u
∗
through
U
(
z
) measured or modelled at any height
z
between 5
h
0
and 10
−
1
h
.
Over very rough surfaces, the downward transfer of momentum is performed by
pressure forces caused by flow-obstacle interactions, and characterized by
h
0
and the
maximal velocity in the roughness layer:
U
R
∼
u
∗
. Assuming that
z
0
u
depends only
on these two parameters yields
z
0
u
∼
h
0
(
u
∗
drops out for dimensionality reasons).
Classical experiments with the sand roughness confirmed this conclusion and gave
z
0
u
≈
1
30
h
0
(Monin and Yaglom, 1971). For actual land surfaces,
z
0
u
/
h
0
varies from
1/10 to 1/30 and exhibits dependences on the shape of and the distance between the
roughness elements, but no systematic dependence on
u
∗
. Accordingly, land sur-
faces are traditionally characterized by their roughness lengths considered as con-
stant parameters independent on the wind speed and stratification.
A few authors did observe that
z
0
u
could depend on stratification (Arya, 1975;
Joffre, 1982; Wood and Mason, 1991; Hasager et al., 2003; Grachev et al., 1997)
or discuss a possibility of increases in
z
0
u
due to convective plumes developing
between warm roughness elements (Coelho and Hunt, 1989; Zilitinkevich et al.,
2006a,b). Nevertheless the traditional consensus was not shaken and, to the best of
the authors' knowledge, neither theoretical models nor systematic empirical analy-
ses of the stratification effects on
z
0
u
have been developed.
To analyze stratified atmospheric flows over rough land surfaces we, in the
regular way, employ the Monin-Obukhov length scale (Monin and Obukhov,
1954):
u
3
∗
F
−
1
b
L
=−
,
(7.3)
Where
F
b
is the vertical turbulent flux of buoyancy (defined as
b
=
g
ρ/ρ
0
,
ρ
is fluid
density,
ρ
0
is its reference value, and
g
is the acceleration of gravity). In the atmo-
sphere,
F
b
≈
(
g
/
T
)
F
θ
, where
T
is a reference value of the absolute temperature and
F
θ
. As a general rule, the role of stratification
is negligible at
z<<L
; but becomes crucial as
z
is the flux of potential temperature,
L
or larger (Monin and Yaglom,
1971). Especially for urban and woodland canopies with
h
0
∼
∼
20-50m, comparable
values of
L
are quite often observed, so that one can expect a pronounced effect of
stratification upon
z
0
u
.
We emphasize that physically
z
0
u
is not a geometric feature of the surface but a
measure of the depth of a sub-layer within the roughness layer with, say, 90% of
the velocity drop from its maximal value,
U
R
∼
h
0
.Giventhe
roughness-layer eddy viscosity scale (
K
M
0
) the above definition allows estimation
of
z
0
u
from the conventional formula
u
, approached at
z
∼
∗
u
2
∗
τ
=
K
M
0
∂
U
/∂
z
taking
τ
∼
and
∂
U
/∂
z
∼
z
0
u
, which gives
2
U
R
/
z
0
u
∼
u
∗
/
2
Equation (7.4) is principally similar to the familiar “smooth-surface roughness length” formula-
tion:
z
0
u
∼
ν/
u
∗
, with the only difference that
K
M
0
is substituted to
ν
.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search