Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
0
pH = 5.69, Blank
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
pH = 5.71, 10.3 g/L alumina
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
1
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
time/h
FIGURE 5.14
Heterogeneous catalysis of MPT by alumina in the aqueous phase.
Thesquaresymbolrepresentsparticle-freesolutionandthetriangularsymbolrepresents
particle-laden solution. Reaction was conducted in 0.003 M acetate buffer. (From Stone,
A.T. 1989.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
127, 429-441.)
on alumina surface enhanced the hydrolysis rate thus providing an additional pathway
for the reaction. The overall reaction rate can be written as
d
[
MPT
−
]
d
t
=
k
base
[
OH
−
][
MPT
−
]+
k
r
=−
K
ads
Γ
OH
−
Γ
MPT
−
,
(5.144)
Γ
where
K
ads
is the adsorbed complex formation constant for MPT
−
on alumina,
Γ
OH
is the OH
−
concentration in the diffuse layer, and
Γ
MPT
−
is the adsorbed MPT
−
concentration (obtained from the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, Section 3.5).
Γ
OH
−
Γ
MPT
−
=[
OH
−
][
MPT
−
]
e
(F(
ψ
s
+ψ
d
)/RT)
.
(5.145)
Utilizing the above equation, we have the overall rate constant for hydrolysis,
k
H
:
k
Γ
K
ads
e
(F(
ψ
s
+ψ
d
)/RT)
+
k
base
k
H
=
[
OH
−
]
.
(5.146)
Thus
k
H
is substantially larger than
k
base
. At a constant pH the exponential term
decreases with ionic strength. Similarly, due to competition from other ions in solution,
K
ads
for MPT
−
also decreases. Thus,
k
H
will decrease with increasing
I
. The above
equation also predicts a maximum in the rate with pH. With increasing pH,
Γ
OH
−
increases and
Γ
MPT
−
decreases. These opposing effects should cancel each other at
some pH where the maximum in rate is observed.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search