Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
or
f
i
f
i
1
V
j
γ
ij
C
i
B
=
η
j
.
(4.91)
j
For the aqueous phase we have
f
i
x
i
w
γ
i
w
f
i
C
i
w
V
w
γ
i
w
f
i
=
=
(4.92)
or
f
i
f
i
1
V
w
γ
i
w
.
C
i
w
=
(4.93)
f
i
, we obtain
Now since
f
i
=
V
w
γ
i
w
j
η
j
V
j
γ
ij
C
i
B
C
i
w
=
K
Bw
=
.
(4.94)
Since the dominant accumulation of hydrophobic solutes in an organism occurs in its
lipid content, we can write
V
w
V
L
γ
i
w
γ
i
L
K
BW
=
·
· η
L
,
(4.95)
where L refers to the lipid phase. Organisms with high lipid content (
η
L
)
should have
high
K
BW
values.
Since
γ
i
w
is directly proportional to the octanol-water partition coefficient,
K
ow
,
we can expect an LFER relationship between
K
BW
and
K
ow
. Using the definition of
K
ow
given previously along with Equation 4.95, we obtain
K
ow
= η
L
γ
i
o
V
o
V
L
.
K
BW
(4.96)
γ
i
L
For compounds that have similar volume fraction of lipids
(
η
L
)
and similar ratios
of activity coefficients
(
γ
i
w
)
, the ratio
K
BW
/
K
ow
should be fairly constant. This
suggests that a linear one-constant correlation should suffice:
γ
i
o
/
log
K
BW
=
a
log
K
ow
+
b
.
(4.97)
Such a correlation was tested and confirmed by Mackay (1982). The correlation
developed was for a restricted set of compounds, namely, those with log
K
ow
<
6,
nonionizable, and those with small
K
B
values. The overall fit to the experimental
data was
1.32,
r
2
log
K
BW
=
log
K
ow
−
=
0.95.
(4.98)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search