Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Has the con-
tent been re-
viewed by an
acknowledged
source?
Is the content
summarized
and discussed
or recommen-
ded by re-
spected pro-
fessionals?
Is the content
cited by
peers?
Is the content
utilized by indi-
viduals, pro-
fessionals, or
organizations?
Is the content
utilized by in-
dividuals, pro-
fessionals, or
organizations?
Utilization
All organizations
All professionals
Is the content
cited by others
in the field?
Is the content
cited by oth-
ers?
Libraries
Is the content
pertinent to
the organiza-
tion's mis-
sion?
Archives
Librarians & informa-
tion professionals
Is the content
pertinent to the
organization's
mission?
Museums
Public and
private agencies
Archivists
Preservation
Curators
Think tanks &
nonprofit agen-
cies
Office managers
Is the format
usable?
Is the format
usable?
Bloggers
Libraries
Is the content
outdated or su-
perseded?
Is the content
outdated or
superseded?
Archives
Librarians & informa-
tion professionals
Museums
Public and
private agencies
Archivists
Is the format
obsolete,
flawed, or oth-
erwise unus-
able?
Is the format
obsolete,
flawed, or oth-
erwise unus-
able?
Discarding
Curators
Think tanks &
nonprofit agen-
cies
Office managers
Bloggers
In this chapter, we will explain this table as a way of simplifying the information
infrastructure and the evaluation of information at each stage of the information
transfer process. We'll begin at the beginning with the creation and recording of
information.
Creation/Recording
One of the first questions to ask when evaluating information is, “What is the
authority for this information?” In other words, who is responsible for creating this
information? Is it an individual? A team? What organization sponsors the research
or creation of this information? What are the credentials of this person or organiz-
Search WWH ::




Custom Search