Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(a)
(b)
Network tuning
Fiber network
(2)
(1)
Normal
processing
(c)
(e)
(g)
(d)
(f)
(h)
Figure 2.6
Thermodynamically and additive-
enhanced fiber tip branching. (a) Design of
network architecture. (b) Modification of
micro/nanostructure of 3D interconnecting
fiber network by controlling fiber branching.
(c-f) illustrates the effects of thermodynamic
driving force on the fiber network structure.
(c,e) are fiber networks formed at higher
temperatures (lower thermodynamic driving
force), (d,f) are the corresponding fiber net-
works formed at lower temperatures (higher
thermodynamic driving force). (g,h) illustrate
the fiber network tuning with a polymer addi-
tives EVACP. With EVACP, unbranched fibers
(g) can be converted to three-dimensionally
interconnecting fiber networks (h). (a,b,g,h)
are reprinted with permission from Ref. [24],
Copyright
©
2002, American Chemical
Society; (e,f) are reprinted with permission
from Ref. [25], Copyright
©
2009, American
Chemical Society.
As has been mentioned, crystallographic mismatch nucleation is a special case
of heterogeneous nucleation where the substrate is the crystal fiber. Designating
the induction time for the nucleation of new fibers on the host fibers as
1/
J
,
where
J
is the rate of the crystallographic mismatch nucleation), the average
branching distance can be expressed as
τ
(
τ
∼
ξ
∼
R
g
τ
∼
R
g
/J
(2.21)
According to 3D nucleation model, the nucleation rate
J
can be expressed as
[20c, 27]
f
[
f
]
1
/
2
B
exp
G
∗
kT
−
J
=
(2.22)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search