Image Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
(e)
(f)
(g)
Fig. 10.1
(continued)
respectively. As these techniques operate over all the bands, most of the data features
have been captured for fusion. However, we observe a high amount of saturation at
some places in both results.
The performance assessment of these results using the no-reference measures and
the participatory measures described in Chap.
9
can be found in Table
10.2
.Wehave
already discussed the participatory performance measures for the moffett
2
dataset
participatory measures have also been provided for a quick reference. All the four
presented solutions provide high values of variance
2
which indicate a good amount
of contrast in them. Comparatively low values of the variance for the techniques of
PLF and CMF are due to over-saturation in these results. The moderate values of the
average gradient
σ
g
for these techniques can also be explained with a similar reasoning.
These two measures quantify the amount of contrast and the sharpness in the images,
respectively. The entropy values
H
are quite high for the results of all techniques,
however the value is the lowest for the result of the three band selection technique.
¯
