Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
z r
= rth modal damping ratio
m r
= rth modal mass (kg)
n = number of modes;
y ir
= ith component of mode shape r
The next step of the theoretical development is to form the cross-correlation function of
two responses ( x ik and x jk ) to a white noise input at a particular input point k . The cross-
correlation function  ijk ( T ) can be defined as the expected value of the product of two re-
sponses evaluated at a time separation of T :
i jk ( T ) = E [ x ( t + T ) x ( t )]
(11-52)
jk
ik
where E is the expectation operator .
Substituting Equation (11-51) into (11-52), recognizing that f k (t) is the only random vari-
able, allows the expectation operator to depend only on the forcing function. Using the defi-
nition of the autocorrelation function , and assuming for simplicity that the forcing function
is white noise, the expectation operation collapses to a scalar times a Dirac delta function .
The Dirac delta function then collapses one of the Duhamel integrations embedded in the
cross-correlation function. The resulting equation can be simplified via a change of vari-
able of integration, setting l = t -t. Using the definition of g from Equation (11-51) and the
trigonometric identity for the sine of a sum results in all the terms involving T being separated
from those involving l. This separation allows terms that depend on T to be factored out of
the remaining integral and out of one of the modal summations, with the following results:
é
ë
ù
cos w d T
ê û
A i jk
exp - z r w n T
n
r =1
i jk ( T ) =
(11-53)
+ B i jk
sin w d T
exp - z r w n T
where A ijk and B ijk are independent of T , are functions of only the modal parameters, and
completely contain the remaining modal summation, as shown in the following equations:
æ
æ
æ
ç ç è
A i jk
sin w d l
-z r w n
ç ç
è ç
ç ç
n
s =1
a k y ir y kr y js y ks
× ¥
°
d l.
l × sin w d l
ò
exp
=
í
í
B i jk
-z s w n
cos w d l
è ç
m w d m y d
r
s
(11-54)
Equation (11-53) is the key result of this derivation. Examining Equation (11-53), the
cross-correlation function is seen to be a sum of decaying sinusoids, with the same charac-
teristics as the impulse response function of the original system. Thus, cross-correlation
functions can be used as impulse response functions in time-domain modal parameter esti-
mation schemes. This is more clearly seen after further simplification using a new constant
multiplier ( Gj r ), as follows:
y ir G r
j
m r w d
n
r =1
exp - z r w n T sin w d T + Q r
R ( T ) =
.
(11-55)
i j
James et al . [1995] present more definition of the intermediate steps in this derivation and the
results of analytical verification checks of the derivation.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search