Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Table II
Table of totals for tillage
variety
Variety
V
1
Tillage
V
2
V
3
V
4
Total
Average
T
1
25.80
27.60
23.90
21.90
99.20
8.267
T
2
28.50
37.40
33.10
29.40
128.40
10.700
T
3
22.50
29.00
25.10
24.00
100.60
8.383
Total
76.80
94.00
82.10
75.30
Average
8.533
10.444
9.122
8.367
3
m
j¼
1
X
4
k¼
1
y
0
jk
1
1
3
25
80
2
00
2
TSS Table II
ð
Þ ¼
CF
¼
:
þþ
24
:
CF
¼
75
:
397
X
n
k¼
1
y
3
X
4
k¼
1
y
1
mr
1
3
2
2
SS
ð
variety
Þ¼
00
k
CF
¼
00
k
CF
:
76
:
8
2
þ
94
:
0
2
þ
82
:
10
2
þ
75
:
30
2
¼
2992
:
09
¼
23
:
992
:
3
:
3
SS
ð
T
V
Þ¼
TSS
ð
Table II
Þ
SS
ð
T
Þ
SS
ð
V
Þ
¼
75
:
397
45
:
207
23
:
992
¼
6
:
198
;
ErSS II
¼
TSS
RSS
SS T
ðÞ
Er
:
SS I
SS V
ðÞ
SS T
ð
V
Þ
¼
75
:
87
0
:
035
45
:
207
23
:
992
6
:
198
0
:
128
¼
0
:
310
:
r
2ErMS-I
rn
-ratios for replication and tillage are
obtained by comparing the respective mean sum
of squares against mean sum of squares due to
error
F
LSD
ð
0
:
05
Þ
¼
t
ð
0
:
025
Þ;
error
Id
:
f
:
r
2
ð
0
:
032
Þ
¼
2
:
776
¼
0
:
2027
:
-ratios
corresponding to subplot factor and the interac-
tion effects are worked out by comparing the
respective mean sum of squares against
I. On the other hand,
the
F
3
4
2. Standard error for difference between two
subplot
q
2ErMS
-
II
r:m
the
treatment means
¼
¼
mean sum of squares due to error II.
It is found that the effects of tillage, variety
and their interaction are significant at both 5%
and 1% level of significance.
So the next task will be to estimate the SEs for
different types of comparison as given below:
1. Standard error for difference between two till-
q
2
ð
0
:
017
Þ
3
3
and the corresponding LSD value
could be
r
2ErMS-II
r:m
LSD
ð
0
:
05
Þ
¼
t
0
:
025
;
error
II d
:
f
:
q
2
ð
0
:
032
Þ
3
4
r
2
q
2ErMS
-
I
rn
ð
0
:
017
Þ
¼
¼
age means
and the
¼
2
:
101
¼
0
:
129
:
3x3
corresponding LSD value could be
