Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Using MS Excel program with the trans-
formed data, we analyze the above data to get
the following ANOVA table:
ANOVA with transformed data
Summary
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
Replication 1
8
7.061452
0.88268156
0.130069
Replication 2
8
8.116066
1.014508192
0.148587
Replication 3
8
7.916744
0.989593054
0.107176
Replication 4
8
7.861564
0.982695553
0.128056
H1
4
2.908485
0.727121255
0.083682
H2
4
2.924279
0.731069822
0.010964
H3
4
3.640283
0.910070657
0.021079
H4
4
3.781612
0.945402946
0.058717
H5
4
5.298242
1.324560395
0.009283
H6
4
5.787106
1.446776523
0.004745
H7
4
1.982271
0.495567808
0.055628
H8
4
4.633549
1.158387312
0.003536
ANOVA
Source of variation
SS
d.f.
MS
F
P
value
F
crit
Replication
0.080983
3
0.026994341
0.856422
0.478938
3.072467
Hormone
2.935294
7
0.419327722
13.30358
0.000
2.487578
Error
0.661918
21
0.031519908
Total
3.678195
31
The LSD value at 5% level of significance is
given by
set per plant, and hormone 5 is statistically at par
with it.
r
2ErMS
r
Hormone Transformed mean
H6
LSD
ð
0
:
05
Þ
¼
t
0
:
025
;
21
1.4468
r
2
H5
1.3246
0
:
0315
H8
1.1584
¼
2
:
08
¼
0
:
261
:
4
H4
0.9454
H3
0.9101
By arranging the treatment means in descen-
ding order, we find that hormone 6 is the best
treatment, recording the highest number of fruit
H2
0.7311
H1
0.7271
H7
0.4956
