Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
conversion of hexose sugars into chemicals is well established; however, the ability
of these organisms to ferment pentose sugars is somewhat less so. The use-
ful exploitation of lignocellulosics by fermentation can be enhanced by efficient
utilization of the pentosanic fraction along with hexoses.
Yeasts that have been studied extensively for use in xylose fermentation include
Pachysolen tannophilus
,
Candida shehatae
,
Pichia stiptis,
and
Kluveromyces marxi-
anus
[3]. The optimal performance of these microorganisms is usually controlled by
the air supply. Other yeasts investigated for their xylose-fermenting ability include
Brettanomyces
,
Clavispora
,
Schizosaccharomyces
, several other species of
Candida
viz.
C. tenius
,
C. tropicalis
,
C. utilis
,
C. blankii
,
C. friedrichii
,
C. solani,
and
C. parapsilosis
, and species of
Debaromyces
viz.
D. nepalensis
and
D. polymorpha
.
Maleszka and Schneider [31] screened 15 yeast strains for their ability to utilize
D-xylose, D-xylulose, and xylitol for ethanol production under aerobic, microaero-
bic (low aeration), and anaerobic conditions using rich undefined or defined media.
In almost all cases, ethanol production by
P. tannophilus
and species belonging
to
Candida
and
Pichia
was better on rich media under microaerobic conditions
[3,4,31].
Several pentose-utilizing fungal species like
Fusarium oxysporum
,
Rhizopus
sp.,
Monilia
sp.
, Neurospora crassa
,
Paecilomyces
sp.,
Mucor
sp.,
Neurospora crassa,
and
F. oxysporum
and bacterial species like
Bacillus macerans
,
B. polymyxa
,
Kiebsiella pneumoniae
,
Clostridium acetobutylicum
,
Aeromonas hydrophila
,
Aerobacter
sp.,
Erwinia
sp.,
Leuconostoc
sp.,
Lactobacillus
sp.,
Clostridium ther-
mocellum
,
C. thermohydrsulfurium
,
C. thermosaccharolyticum
, and
C. thermosul-
furogenes
utilizing pentose, hexose, and lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol
production have been extensively reviewed [32].
Fermentation Methodologies
Researchers have performed all three fermentation processes (batch, fed-batch,
and continuous) for biomass conversion into ethanol. The most suitable fermen-
tation strategy depends upon the growth kinetics of the microorganism, the type of
hydrolysate, and the economics of the process. For ethanol production from lig-
nocellulosic biomass, batch fermentation has been extensively utilized in the past.
The batch process is a multivessel approach that allows flexible operation and easy
control in the bioconversion process [33]. In fed-batch fermentation, the micro-
bial cells can be acclimatized at low substrate concentrations that later assist in
accelerating the rate of ethanol formation during the entire course of the biocon-
version process. Fed-batch fermentation processes are ideal to obtain a high cell
density, which may help to achieve higher ethanol yields with greater productivity.
Higher cell density also helps to reduce the toxicity of lignocellulose hydrolysates,
particularly acid hydrolysates, to yeast cells. Continuous fermentation is another
state-of-the-art technology in which microorganisms work at a lower substrate con-
centration, maintaining higher ethanol concentration during the entire course of the
fermentation reaction [34]. Table 3 summarizes the fermentation profiles of different
microorganisms utilizing a variety of lignocellulose hydrolysates.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search