Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
instability induced by XPM has fundamental importance as it suggests the possi-
bility of the soliton formation in the normal regime and it also has practical impli-
cations for the propagation of visible radiation in optical fibbers.
5.5.1 Theory
In order to present the major results in a possible simplest way, let us consider the
case of two optical fields propagating in a single mode fiber. The field amplitudes
are
A
1 and
A
2, respectively that satisfy the nonlinear Schrodinger equation [
11
,
12
]
modified for XPM by the addition of cross coupling term:
2
β
j
∂
2
Aj
∂
Aj
∂
z
+
V
−
1
∂
Aj
∂
t
1
2
α
j
A
j
1
2
2
(5.1)
i
+
=
− γ
j
A
j
+
2
A
3
−
j
A
j
gj
∂
t
2
where
j
=
1 or 2,
V
g
shows the group velocity,
α
j
is the absorption coefficient
(
β
j
=
dvg
−
1
/d
ω
and
β
j
< 0 for anomalous dispersion) and
ω
j
CA
eff
γ
j
=
n
2
(5.2)
related to fiber nonlinearity that is responsible for the both SPM and XPM. In Eq.
(
5.2
),
A
eff
denotes the effective core area for silica fibers. And the last term in Eq. (
5.1
)
is because of XPM that couples the two waves. It is the XPM-induced coupling due to
that modulation instability in the normal dispersion regime occurs provided that
β
j
> 0
for both waves. For the sake of simplification, we neglect the fiber loss by setting
α
j
=
0 because inclusion of the fiber losses do not change the basic concept of the sub-
ject. Steady-state solution of Eq. (
5.1
) is given in the following equation showing that
P
j
e
(
i
φ
j
)
,
(5.3)
A
j
=
j
=
1, 2
P
j
relates to optical power and phase
(5.4)
φ
j
= γ
j
P
j
+
2
P
3
−
j
Z
We can assume the stability of the steady state by letting
e
(
i
φ
j
)
(5.5)
A
j
=
P
j
+
a
j
Showing
α
j
as weak perturbation, linearizing equation (
5.1
) in
a
1
and
a
2
gives
∂
a
j
∂
z
∂
a
j
∂
t
+
V
−
1
gj
i
2
β
j
∂
2
a
j
1
−
2
γ
j
(
P
1
P
2
)
2
a
j
+
a
j
a
3
−
j
+
a
∗
3
−
j
=
∂
t
2
− γ
j
P
j
(5.6)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search