Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 9.4
Examples of Impact Scale Description Criteria - While objective approaches to identifying impacts and assigning
signifi cance attributes may exist, evaluating and ranking impact signifi cance will remain largely a subjective exercise
Negligible
Small localized impact
Low probability of occurrence
Impact is reversible
Minor
Abnormal operating conditions would cause breach of legislation
Impact and probability of occurrence both small
Emissions are within statutory thresholds
Moderate
Moderate impact occurring over short period
Environment has time to recover
Project benefi ts are limited to few people
Signifi cant
Project activity has an irreversible impact, but impact is moderate
Project activity results in a breach of legislation under abnormal operating conditions
Confl ict with established recreational, agricultural, or other established uses of the project area
Effect and probability of occurrence are moderate
Tailings dam exceeds 15 m in height (World Bank 2001b)
Project benefi ts entire community
Severe
Impact is irreversible affecting a high number of people
Impact causes resettlement of more than 500 households (ADB 1998)
Impact exceeds legal thresholds
Disrupts or adversely affects a property of cultural signifi cance to a community or ethnic or social group
Project induces substantial growth or concentration of population
Project converts prime agricultural land to nonagricultural use
Unacceptable (applies to negative impacts only)
High likelihood of catastrophic failure
Loss of life
Impact on nationally/internationally recognized environmental protection areas/heritage sites
9.3 DECIDING ON THE METHODOLOGY
There are as many methodologies to assess impacts as there are impacts. Before selecting a
specii c method, consideration should be given to acceptability, accuracy, relevance, coni -
dence limits, and proportionality of efforts
Is the method objective? Objectivity is a prerequisite for acceptability and credibility of
the environmental assessment. Objectivity diminishes the possibility that predictions auto-
matically support preconceived notions that are usually the result of self-interest, lack of
Objectivity is a prerequisite for
acceptability and credibility of
environmental assessment.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search