Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 10. The best fitting (at the end of computer run Sim2 listed in Tab.3) GG model and
related MVPE configuration. Captions as in Fig.9.
Figure 11. The best fitting (at the end of computer run Sim4 listed in Tab.3) GG model and
related MVPE configuration. Captions as in Fig.9.
the possible final virialized mass density profiles, to select the related MVPE configuration.
Simulated mass distributions at the end of the computer run have been fitted by Γ density
profiles, but better choices could in principle exist (e.g. Caimmi, 2006) which, on the other
hand, are expected to yield similar results.
In conclusion, MVPE configurations can neither explain the tilt of the FP of ETGs, nor
make preferential final states at the end of the transition from non equilibrium to virialized
configurations, in the light of the current assumptions. To this aim, some other additional
Search WWH ::
Custom Search