Database Reference
In-Depth Information
'
CTT. Second, two VETs by executing Query 10 (Q 10) that comprises
of IQ2, IQ18, IQ19, IQ4, and IQ21. The two VETs are the
sales_fact
'
'
product VET that
equals 16, and the
VET that equals 17. Third, a CTT and a VET by
executing Query 11 (Q 11) that comprises of IQ15, IQ8, IQ20, IQ1, and IQ21
respectively. These two tables are the
'
sales_fact
'
VET that
equals 17. Figure 11 shows the three Left Join operations that are used in this
experiment. The experimental results of Exp. 4 shows that the query execution time
of CTT-and-VET is faster than CTT, and the VET is the fastest of the three queries
when 1 row and 100 rows are retrieved. The details of the queries used in this
experiment are shown in Tables 3 and 4 , the output of these queries is shown in
Fig. 12 , and the throughputs of this experiment are depicted in Fig. 16 (g) and (h).
'
product
'
CTT, and the
'
sales_fact
'
Fig. 11. The three left joins of the Left Join experiment
Fig. 12. The output of the Medium-to-Complex Query Experiment (Left Join)
(5) Complex Query Experiment - Targeted Tables (Exp. 5): In this experiment, the
function of the Targeted Table Query Algorithm is invoked to join two CTTs
by executing Query 12 (Q 12) that comprises of IQ22 and IQ23, two VETs by
Search WWH ::




Custom Search