Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Exploiting Genetic Differences
There are studies showing genotypic differences for P deficiency tolerance
suggesting that P efficiency mechanisms may differ among wheat, rye and triticale
genotypes (Ozturk et al. 2005 ; Manske et al. 2001 ; Osborne and Rengel 2002 ;
Gunes et al. 2006 ). Hammond et al. ( 2009 ) observed a considerable diverse species-
wide variation for shoot P concentrations and several PUE measures in Brassica
oleracea landraces and commercial varieties. Manske et al. ( 2001 ) argued that
under P deficient conditions P uptake efficiency plays the key determinant for yield,
whereas P utilisation efficiency was more relevant under well P supplied condi-
tions. There are also several investigations in other Brassica plants aiming to
exploit genetic diversity (Akhtar et al. 2008 ; Solaiman et al. 2007 ; Yang
et al. 2010 , 2011 ).
Batten ( 1992 ) pointed out that selection of more P efficient wheat occurs
unconsciously during breeding when selecting for higher yields at sub-optimal P
levels. Chin et al. ( 2010 ) mentioned a similar observation of an unconscious
selection for a major P deficiency tolerant rice QTL, Pup1 , in drought tolerant
varieties developed under unfavourable conditions. Hammond et al. ( 2009 ) simi-
larly implicated inadvertent selection in B. oleracea breeding programmes.
The selection process resulting in modern ( Brassica ) crop varieties with
increased grain yield per mg shoot P (Hammond et al. 2009 ) might be just a result
of higher HI (Batten and Khan 1987 ), rather than a selection of physiological traits
(Rose and Wissuwa 2012 ). Chin et al. ( 2010 ) support that hypothesis by observing a
lower frequency of the low P-tolerant QTL Pup1 in modern irrigated rice varieties
compared to traditional varieties. There are further studies showing that enhanced
low P tolerance in wheat was due to enhanced P uptake rather than enhanced P
utilisation (Gahoonia et al. 1996 ; Gahoonia et al 1999 ).
A comparison of new CIMMYT wheat varieties with an older Mexican variety
showed that PUE did not differ (Egle et al. 1999 ). However, P acquisition under low
P conditions was improved mainly due to a better root length density, especially
during the period during anthesis and grain filling (Egle et al. 1999 ). With P
fertilisation, root length density was not significantly different between the older
and the modern varieties, but higher P uptake rates, especially during grain filling,
of the modern varieties seemed to have contributed to higher P acquisition ability at
appropriate P supply. A higher shoot growth and a subsequently higher sink
capacity of more kernels might have contributed to that effect (Egle et al. 1999 ).
In maize, several studies have identified distinguishable P uptake amongst geno-
types (Da Silva and Gabelman 1992 ; Zhu and Lynch 2004 ; Chen et al. 2009a , b ;de
Sousa et al. 2012 ), without providing large amounts of potential target genes for
exploiting crop biodiversity (Calder´n-V´zquez et al. 2008 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search