Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Solomon KR, Takacs P (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment using species sensitivity distributions.
In: Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology.
Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 285-313
Spijker J, Mol G, Posthuma L (Accepted for publication) Regional ecotoxicological hazards
associated with anthropogenic enrichment of heavy metals
Spijker J, Van Vlaardingen PLA, Mol G (2008) Backgroundvalues and the relation with soiltype
in Dutch soils (in Dutch). RIVM - Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the
Environment. Report nr RIVM report no. 7117101074, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Sprenger MD, Charters DW (1997) Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund: process
for designing and conducting ecological risk assessment, interim final. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Environmental Response Team, Edison, NJ
Stephan CE, Mount DI, Hansen DJ, Gentile JH, Chapman GA, Brungs WA (1985) Guidelines for
deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and
their uses. US EPA ORD ERL. Report nr PB 85-22(7049), Duluth MN, pp 1-97
Struijs J, Meent DVD, Peijnenburg WJGM, Hoop MAGTvd, Crommentuijn T (1997) Added risk
approach to derive maximum permissible concentrations for heavy metals, how to take into
account the natural background levels? Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 37:112-118
Suter GW (2002) North American history of species sensitivity distributions. In: Posthuma L, Suter
GW II, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton,
FL, pp 11-18
Suter GW, Cormier SM (2008) What is meant by risk-based environmental quality criteria.
Integrated Environ Assess Monitor 4(4):486-489
Suter GW, Efroymson RA, Sample BE, Jones DS (2000) Ecological risk assessment for contami-
nated sites. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
Suter GW, Traas TP, Posthuma L (2002) Issues and practices in the derivation and use of species
sensitivity distributions. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity
distributions in ecotoxicology, 1st edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 437-474
Swartjes FA (1999) Risk-based assessment of soil and groundwater quality in the Netherlands:
standards and remediation urgency. Risk Anal 19(6):1235-1249
Traas TP (2003) Evaluatie van groep- en somnormen in het kader van Integrale Normstelling
Stoffen. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Report nr 601501 016,
Bilthoven
Tyler G (1984) The impact of heavy metal pollution on forests: a case study of Gusum, Sweden.
Ambio 13:18-24
UNESCO (2005) The precautionary principle. Paris, France
U.S.EPA (1978a) Federal Register, 43: 21506-2(1518) May 18. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC
U.S.EPA (1978b) Federal Register, 43: 2(9028) July 5. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC
U.S.EPA (1995) Fed. Regist. 60: 15366-1(5425) March 23. (The methodology for deriving aquatic
life Tier I criteria is on pages 15393-15399, whereas the methodology for deriving aquatic
life Tier II values is on pages 15399-1(5400)) U.S. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC
U.S.EPA (2002) ECOTOXicology Database system. Available at
http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/
.
Accessed 18 August 2010
U.S.EPA (2003) Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. November. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency and Remedial Response. OSWER Directive 92857-55
U.S.EPA (2005) Ecological soil screening levels for cadmium. Interim final. OSWER Directive
92857-65, March 2005
Van de Meent D, Aldenberg T, Canton JH, Van Gestel CAM, Slooff W (1990) Desire for levels.
Background study for the policy document “setting environmental quality standards for water
and soil”. Report nr RIVM-no.670101002, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Search WWH ::
Custom Search