Statistical Sampling Strategies for Survey of Soil Contamination - Dealing with Contaminated Sites: From Theory Towards Practical Application - page 205

exceeds the original threshold concentration), and few false positives (i.e., cases
where the composite exceeds the modified threshold concentration, while none of
the individuals exceeds the original threshold concentration).

Acknowledgements I would like to thank R.O. Gilbert for his valuable comments on this chapter.

References

Back P-E (2007) A model for estimating the value of sampling programs and the optimal number
of samples for contaminated soil. Environ Geol 52:573-585
Boswell MT, Gore SD, Lovison G, Patil GP (1996) Annotated bibliography of composite sampling,
part A. Environ Ecol Stat 3:1-49
Brus DJ, de Gruijter JJ (1997) Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between
design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80:
1-59
Brus DJ, de Gruijter JJ (2003) A method to combine non-probability sample data with probability
sample data in estimating spatial means of environmental variables. Environ Monitor Assess
83:303-317
Brus DJ, de Gruijter JJ, van Groenigen JW (2007) Digital soil mapping. An introductory perspec-
tive, chapter 14: Designing spatial coverage samples using the k-means clustering algorithm.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 183-192
Brus DJ, Heuvelink GBM (2007) Optimization of sample patterns for universal kriging of
environmental variables. Geoderma 138:86-95
Brus DJ, Lame FPJ, Nieuwenhuis R (2009) National baseline survey of soil quality in the
Netherlands. environmental pollution. Environ Pollut 157:2043-2052
Brus DJ, Nieuwenhuizen W, Koomen A (2006) Can we gain precision by sampling with proba-
bilities proportional to size in surveying recent landscape changes in the Netherlands? Environ
Monitor Assess 122:153-169
Brus DJ, Spätjens LEEM, de Gruijter JJ (1999) A sampling scheme for estimating the
mean extractable phosphorus concentration of fields for environmental regulation. Geoderma
89:129-148
Carson JH (2001) Analysis of composite sampling data using the principle of maximum entropy.
Environ Ecol Stat 8:201-211
Chang Y-C, Yeh H-D (2007) Optimum allocation for soil contamination investigations in Hsinchu,
Taiwan, by double sampling. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1585-1592
Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques. Wiley, New York
Correll RL (2001) The use of composite sampling in contaminated sites - a case study. Environ
Ecol Stat 8:185-200
de Gruijter JJ, Brus DJ, Bierkens MFP, Knotters M (2006) Sampling for natural resource
monitoring. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1997) GSLIB . Geostatistical software library and user's guide, 2nd ed.
Oxford University, Oxford
Elder RS, Thompson WO, Myers RH (1980) Properties of composite sampling procedures.
Technometrics 22:179-186
EPA (2006) Guidance on systematic planning using the Data Quality Objectives Process. Technical
Document EPA QA/G-4, EPA/240/B-06/001, Office of Environmental Information, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Englund EJ, Heravi N (1994) Phased sampling for soil remediation. Environ Ecol Stat 1:247-263
Freeze RA, James B, Massmann J, Sperling T, Smith L (1992) Hydrogeological decision analysis:
4. The concept of data worth and its use in the development of site investigation strategies.
Ground Water 30:574-588