Autonomic Frameworks Deployment Using Configuration and Service Delivery Models for the Internet of Things - Interoperability and Open-Source Solutions for the Internet of Things - page 99

proposed architecture design with the autonomic functionality implemented can be used
to support a full range of self-management capabilities for autonomic environments.
The described framework for the self-deployment and self-con

guration individ-
ually introduce autonomic computing to the state-of-the-art IoT platforms as an
approach for the IoT service lifecycle control loop implementation.
Future work might consist of developing frameworks/implement components for
other parts of the service cycle and the development of other agents (autonomic self-
healing and self-protection) and as well as integration of the agents.

Acknowledgments. Part of this work has been carried out in the scope of the project ICT
OpenIoT Project, Open Source blueprint for large scale self-organising cloud environments for
Internet of Things applications which is co-funded by the European Commission under seventh
framework program, contract number FP7-ICT-2011-7-287305-OpenIoT and the project Fed4-
FIRE, Federation for FIRE with contract number FP7-ICT-2011-8-318389.

References

1. Horn, P.: Autonomic computing: IBM ' s perspective on the state of information technology,
IBM Corporation (2001)
2. Serrano, M., Hauswirth, M., Kefalakis, N., Soldatos, J.: A self-organizing architecture for
cloud by means of infrastructure performance and event data. In: IEEE Cloudcom, Bristol,
UK, 2 - 5 December 2013, ISBN: 978-0-7695-5095-4
3. Serrano, J.M.: Management and Context Integration Based on Ontologies for Pervasive
Service Operations in Autonomic Communication Systems. Ph.D. thesis, UPC (2008)
4. Xu, X., Bessis, N., Cao, J.: An autonomic agent trust model for IoT systems. Comput. Sci.
21, 107 - 113 (2013)
5. Rajan, M.A., Balamuralidhar, P., Chethan, K.P., Swarnahpriyaah, M.: A self-recongurable
sensor network management system for internet of things paradigm. In: 2011 International
Conference on Devices and Communications (ICDeCom), pp. 1 - 5. IEEE, February 2011
6. Ramakrishnan, A., Naqvi, S.N.Z., Bhatti, Z.W., Preuveneers, D., Berbers, Y.: Learning
deployment trade-offs for self-optimization of Internet of Things applications. In:
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomic Computing, ICAC 2013,
pp. 213 - 224, June 2013
7. Ghezzi, C., Pacici, F.: Evolution of software composition mechanisms: a survey. In: Lucia,
D., Ferrucci, F., Tortora, G., Tucci, M. (eds.) Emerging Methods, Technologies, and Process
Management in Software Engineering, pp. 3 - 19. Wiley, New York (2008)
8. Ayala, I., Pinilla, M.A., Fuentes, L.: Exploiting dynamic weaving for self-managed agents in
the IoT. In: Timm, I.J., Guttmann, C. (eds.) MATES 2012. LNCS, vol. 7598, pp. 5 - 14.
Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
9. Deb, D., Fuad, M.M., Oudshoorn, M.J.: Achieving self-managed deployment

in a

distributed environment. J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng. 11, 115 - 125 (2011)
10. Gosling, J. (ed.): The Java Language Specication. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
(2000)
11. Grimm, R., Anderson, T., Bershad, B., Wetherall, D.: A system architecture for pervasive
computing. In: Proceedings of the 9th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop:
Beyond the PC: New Challenges for the Operating System, pp. 177 - 182. ACM, September
2000