Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Maclaurin expansion (4.79), from which the FPT
(+)
is derived. Obviously,
this latter point is associated precisely to z
−1
=∞in the FPT
(−)
, since in
this version of the FPT, the harmonic expansion variable is z
−1
. Thus, the
“ghost” zero z
−1
=∞is one of the K zeros of P
−
K
(z
−1
) in the FPT
(−)
and,
therefore, it should be ignored for the same reason used to eliminate the point
z = 0 from the FPT
(+)
. Naturally, in numerical computations, the point
z
−1
=∞cannot be reached exactly. Nevertheless, one of the zeros from the
reconstructed set{z
−
k,P
}must have a very large real and imaginary part, and
this will become more pronounced by increasing the degree K of P
−
K
(z
−1
) in
the FPT
(−)
. The two “ghost” zeros, z = 0 and z
−1
=∞in the FPT
(+)
and
FPT
(−)
, respectively, have been found in our computations, exactly as per
the outlined description. Moreover, the computations from chapters 3 and
6 with noisefree and noisecorrupted FIDs did not detect any “ghost” poles
and, therefore, it follows
K
T
= K
G
+ K
F
.
(5.12)
Note that although the numerator polynomials P
±
K
(z
±1
) are of degree K, the
total number of their zeros will be K−1 instead of K because of the excluded
“ghost” zero in each polynomial. This was already discussed in chapter 3 and
will be addressed again in chapter 6 in more detailed illustrations.
5.4 Signal-noise separation with exclusive reliance upon
resonant frequencies
As explained, the sets of all the poles{z
±
k,Q
}consist of the two disjoint subsets
of the genuine and Froissart poles
{z
±
k,Q
={z
±
k,Q
⊕{z
±
k,Q
}
}
}
k∈K
F
.
(5.13)
k∈K
T
k∈K
G
Here,K
T
is the
set of all the values of k. Since there are no common elements in the two subsets
{z
±
k,Q
G
is the set of the counting indices k for the genuine poles andK
and{z
±
k,Q
}
k∈K
F
, their sums from (5.13) represent the socalled
direct sums as labeled by the usual symbol⊕for disjoint sets. Therefore, it
is su
cient to count the number K
F
of Froissart doublets to obtain the exact
number K
G
of the genuine poles through K
G
= K
T
−K
F
as in (5.12). In
practice, as soon as the FPT
(±)
are found to fully converge, one should make
a straightforward binning of all the reconstructed poles{z
±
k,P
}
k∈K
G
}
k∈K
T
into two
sets{z
±
k,Q
}
k∈K
G
depending on whether or not z
±
k,Q
= z
±
k,P
,
i.e., whether or not (5.11) is fulfilled. This grouping allows an unambiguous
recovery of the true number K
G
of the genuine poles associated with the exact
and{z
±
k,Q
}
k∈K
F
Search WWH ::
Custom Search