Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Maclaurin expansion (4.79), from which the FPT (+) is derived. Obviously,
this latter point is associated precisely to z −1 =∞in the FPT (−) , since in
this version of the FPT, the harmonic expansion variable is z −1 . Thus, the
“ghost” zero z −1 =∞is one of the K zeros of P K (z −1 ) in the FPT (−) and,
therefore, it should be ignored for the same reason used to eliminate the point
z = 0 from the FPT (+) . Naturally, in numerical computations, the point
z −1 =∞cannot be reached exactly. Nevertheless, one of the zeros from the
reconstructed set{z k,P
}must have a very large real and imaginary part, and
this will become more pronounced by increasing the degree K of P K (z −1 ) in
the FPT (−) . The two “ghost” zeros, z = 0 and z −1 =∞in the FPT (+) and
FPT (−) , respectively, have been found in our computations, exactly as per
the outlined description. Moreover, the computations from chapters 3 and
6 with noisefree and noisecorrupted FIDs did not detect any “ghost” poles
and, therefore, it follows
K T = K G + K F .
(5.12)
Note that although the numerator polynomials P ± K (z ±1 ) are of degree K, the
total number of their zeros will be K−1 instead of K because of the excluded
“ghost” zero in each polynomial. This was already discussed in chapter 3 and
will be addressed again in chapter 6 in more detailed illustrations.
5.4 Signal-noise separation with exclusive reliance upon
resonant frequencies
As explained, the sets of all the poles{z ± k,Q
}consist of the two disjoint subsets
of the genuine and Froissart poles
{z ± k,Q
={z ± k,Q
⊕{z ± k,Q
}
}
}
k∈K F .
(5.13)
k∈K T
k∈K G
Here,K
T is the
set of all the values of k. Since there are no common elements in the two subsets
{z ± k,Q
G is the set of the counting indices k for the genuine poles andK
and{z ± k,Q
} k∈K F , their sums from (5.13) represent the socalled
direct sums as labeled by the usual symbol⊕for disjoint sets. Therefore, it
is su cient to count the number K F of Froissart doublets to obtain the exact
number K G of the genuine poles through K G = K T −K F as in (5.12). In
practice, as soon as the FPT (±) are found to fully converge, one should make
a straightforward binning of all the reconstructed poles{z ± k,P
} k∈K G
} k∈K T
into two
sets{z ± k,Q
} k∈K G depending on whether or not z ± k,Q = z ± k,P ,
i.e., whether or not (5.11) is fulfilled. This grouping allows an unambiguous
recovery of the true number K G of the genuine poles associated with the exact
and{z ± k,Q
} k∈K F
Search WWH ::




Custom Search