Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
through the following representation
K
zFPT
(±)
∝g
±
K,P
(z
±1
−z
±
r,P
)
Spectra
in
(5.3)
r=1
or the poles{z
±
k,Q
}via
K
in pFPT
(±)
∝g
±
K,Q
(z
±1
−z
±
s,Q
)
Spectra
(5.4)
s=1
where g
±
K,P
and g
±
K,Q
represent the socalled gain factors.
Clearly, if zeros
{z
±
k,P
}and poles{z
±
k,Q
}are simultaneously employed within shape spectra
and/or in quantification, the usual composite representations FPT
(±)
are ob
tained through the union of the two new constituent representations, the
zFPT
(±)
and pFPT
(±)
.
Alternatively, the zFPT
(±)
and pFPT
(±)
can be investigated via the canon
ical forms of the polynomials P
±
K
(z
±1
)
K
P
±
K
(z
±1
) = p
±
K
(z
±1
−z
±
r,P
)
(5.5)
r=1
and Q
±
K
(z
±1
)
K
Q
±
K
(z
±1
) = q
±
K
(z
±1
−z
±
s,Q
).
(5.6)
s=1
With these formulae it becomes possible to write the corresponding expres
sions for the general derivatives of the polynomials P
±
K
(z
±1
) and Q
±
K
(z
±1
).
For instance, the first derivatives of Q
±
K
(z
±1
), which will be needed in this
chapter at z
±1
= z
±
k,Q
, can be obtained by the following explicit expressions
d
dz
±1
Q
±
K
(z
±1
)
′
(z
±
k,Q
)≡
Q
±
K
z
±1
=z
±
k,Q
K
= q
±
K
(z
±
k,Q
−z
±
s,Q
).
(5.7)
s=1,s=k
Here, it is seen that for simple poles, defined as the nonconfluent zeros z
±
k,Q
=
z
±
k
′
,Q
(k
′
= k) of the denominator polynomial Q
±
K
(z
±1
), the first derivative
Q
±
K
′
(z
±
k,Q
) is always different from zero
Q
±
K
′
(z
±
k,Q
) = 0.
(5.8)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search