Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
through the following representation
K
zFPT (±) ∝g ± K,P
(z ±1 −z ± r,P )
Spectra
in
(5.3)
r=1
or the poles{z ± k,Q
}via
K
in pFPT (±) ∝g ± K,Q
(z ±1 −z ± s,Q )
Spectra
(5.4)
s=1
where g ± K,P
and g ± K,Q
represent the socalled gain factors.
Clearly, if zeros
{z ± k,P
}and poles{z ± k,Q
}are simultaneously employed within shape spectra
and/or in quantification, the usual composite representations FPT (±) are ob
tained through the union of the two new constituent representations, the
zFPT (±) and pFPT (±) .
Alternatively, the zFPT (±) and pFPT (±) can be investigated via the canon
ical forms of the polynomials P ± K (z ±1 )
K
P ± K (z ±1 ) = p ± K
(z ±1 −z ± r,P )
(5.5)
r=1
and Q ± K (z ±1 )
K
Q ± K (z ±1 ) = q ± K
(z ±1 −z ± s,Q ).
(5.6)
s=1
With these formulae it becomes possible to write the corresponding expres
sions for the general derivatives of the polynomials P ± K (z ±1 ) and Q ± K (z ±1 ).
For instance, the first derivatives of Q ± K (z ±1 ), which will be needed in this
chapter at z ±1 = z ± k,Q , can be obtained by the following explicit expressions
d
dz ±1 Q ± K (z ±1 )
(z ± k,Q )≡
Q ± K
z ±1 =z ± k,Q
K
= q ± K
(z ± k,Q
−z ± s,Q ).
(5.7)
s=1,s=k
Here, it is seen that for simple poles, defined as the nonconfluent zeros z ± k,Q
=
z ± k ,Q (k = k) of the denominator polynomial Q ± K (z ±1 ), the first derivative
Q ± K (z ± k,Q ) is always different from zero
Q ± K (z ± k,Q ) = 0.
(5.8)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search