Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
are kept in their composite intermediate forms without performing the final
multiplications in (4.38). This would permit the exact cancellation of the de
nominator
n
m=2 λ (s)
2m−2 by the associated portion of the numerator in H n (c s )
from (4.38) to give the exact result in the integer form H n (c s ) = N (s n .
The extension of the PD algorithm from its original nondelayed versions
of Gordon [158] to the delayed version of Belkic [5] is especially advantageous
with respect to the eigenvalues{u k
}. When only the nondelayed CF coef
ficients{a n }≡{a (0)
}are available as in Ref. [158], the eigenvalues{u k }
are generated either by solving the eigenproblem for the Jacobi matrix or by
rooting the corresponding characteristic polynomial Q K (u) = 0 [5]. On the
other hand, the delayed CF coe cients{a (s)
n
}can avoid altogether these two
latter conventional procedures and offer an alternative way of computing the
eigenvalues of data matrices from the following limiting procedure
n
λ (s)
1,2k+1
s→∞ a (s)
u k = lim
= lim
s→∞
.
(4.39)
2k
λ (s)
1,2k−1 λ (s)
1,2k
For checking purposes, it is also useful to apply the same limit s−→∞to
the string{a (s)
2n+1
}and this gives
λ (s)
1,2k+2
s→∞ a (s)
lim
= lim
s→∞
= 0.
(4.40)
2k+1
λ (s)
1,2k λ (s)
1,2k+1
To verify the accuracy of the results for the eigenvalues{u k
}computed by
means of the relation u k = lim s→∞ a (s)
2k from (4.39) within the delayed PD
algorithm we can use the analytical expression for a (s)
2k .
The exact closed
formula for the general delayed CF coe cients a (s)
has been obtained by
n
Belkic [5, 17] as
−σ (s n π (s)
−λ (s n π (s)
n+1 = c n+s
a (s)
n−1
n−4
(4.41)
π (s)
n
n
n
2
π (s)
a (s)
i
a (s)
j
σ (s)
n
=
=
(4.42)
n
i=1
j=2
n−3
j+1
k+1
λ (s)
a (s)
j
(s)
j
ξ (s)
j
a (s)
k
a (s)
] 2
=
=
(4.43)
n
j= [ n− 2 ]
k=2
ℓ=2
π (s)
σ (s)
≡0
(n≤0)
≡0
(n≤3)
(4.44)
n
n
where the symbol [n/2] denotes the integer part of n/2. Once the CF coef
ficients{a (s)
}have been generated, all the input time signal points{c n+s }
could be reconstructed exactly using the explicit expression
c n+s = π (s)
n
n+1 + σ (s n π (s)
n−1 + λ (s n π (s)
n−4 .
(4.45)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search