Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Tabl e 6 . 29
Tree size average (range) with wins (bold) and losses (italic).
Arrythmya
Balance
Car
Clev. HD2
Clev.HD5
CNS
Gini
12.2 (10)
26.6 (10)
66.2 (38)
6.8 ( 8)
5.6 (16)
1.6 (2)
Info Gain
12.8 ( 8)
26.6 (20)
58.0 (34)
7.8 ( 8)
6.8 ( 8)
2.0 (2)
Twoing
11.6 (14)
27.6 ( 8)
66.0 (26)
8.8 (10)
5.8 (12)
2.4 (2)
C4.5
37.8 (24)
43.6 (12)
71.4 (12)
19.2 (10)
34.8 (16)
6.2 (4)
MEE
36.2 (10)
90.6 (52)
115.0 (48)
18.8 (12)
22.0 (42)
3.2 (4)
Colon
Cork stop.
Credit
CTG
Dermatol.
E-coli
Gini
3.0 (0)
5.0 (0)
3.0 ( 0)
74.6 (46)
13.4 (6)
10.8 (12)
Info Gain
3.0 (6)
5.0 (0)
3.0 ( 0)
70.2 (52)
15.8 (6)
10.2 (14)
Twoing
3.0 (4)
5.0 (0)
3.0 ( 0)
60.0 (30)
16.2 (2)
11.0 (14)
C4.5
5.8 (2)
5.8 (6)
24.8 (20)
136 (26)
13.0 (0)
17.2 ( 8)
MEE
3.2 (2)
5.0 (0)
12.4 (24)
56.8 (16)
14.1 (2)
9.4 ( 2)
Flags
H. surv
Heart
Image Seg.
Landsat
Led
Gini
12.8 (12)
4.2 (28)
11.2 (12)
79.8 (58)
108.8 (80)
22.0 (24)
Info Gain
10.0 (14)
1.0 (0)
10.8 (32)
55.2 (36)
131.2 (98)
20.6 ( 8)
Twoing
10.6 (20)
2.6 (8)
8.4 (10)
70.4 (74)
110.4 (98)
25.6 (20)
C4.5
27.8 ( 6)
4.2 ( 6)
17.2 ( 8)
59.8 (18)
331.6 (58)
22.0 ( 6)
MEE
20.0 (36)
1.0 ( 0)
19.4 (14)
32.4 ( 8)
125.6 (56)
23.0 ( 4)
Leukemia
LRS
Lymphog.
Mammog.
Monk
Mushrrom
Gini
3.0 (0)
11.6 ( 4)
6.0 ( 4)
5.8 (14)
28.8 (28)
18.2 ( 8)
Info Gain
3.0 (0)
11.8 ( 6)
6.0 ( 4)
6.2 ( 6)
30.0 (24)
16.2 ( 2)
Twoing
3.0 (0)
11.2 ( 2)
6.4 ( 4)
6.2 ( 6)
27.0 (24)
18.8 ( 2)
C4.5
3.8 (2)
28.8 (12)
13.8 ( 8)
16.8 ( 4)
31.0 (14)
23.0 ( 0)
MEE
3.0 (0)
24.2 ( 6)
17.6 (22)
24.6 (12)
33.6 (28)
42.6 (16)
Ozone
Page blks
Parkinsons
Pen Digits
P. Diabetes
P. Gene
Gini
1.0 ( 0)
23.4 (28)
5.4 ( 8)
336.8 (184)
6.0 ( 4)
7.8 (10)
Info Gain
1.0 ( 0)
23.4 (22)
7.6 (10)
327.6 (216)
6.6 (14)
5.6 ( 8)
Twoing
3.4 (24)
22.6 (24)
8.8 (18)
371.2 (152)
8.4 (36)
7.0 ( 8)
C4.5
54.0 (34)
54.8 (16)
15.0 ( 4)
271.4 ( 32)
30.6 (28)
11.4 ( 6)
MEE
1.0 ( 2)
20.8 ( 6)
3.0 ( 0)
233.0 ( 60)
2.2 ( 4)
8.6 ( 8)
Robot-1
Spect-Heart Spectf-Heart
Swiss HD
Synth. Chart
Thyroid
Gini
8.2 (4)
6.0 (14)
1.6 ( 6)
1.8 ( 8)
24.8 (20)
8.0 ( 6)
Info Gain
8.8 (4)
13.4 (24)
1.0 ( 0)
1.0 ( 0)
37.4 (18)
7.4 ( 8)
Twoing
9.4 (2)
5.8 (20)
2.2 (12)
1.6 ( 6)
39.2 (24)
9.2 (12)
C4.5
10.4 (4)
13.6 ( 4)
28.4 (12)
17.8 (16)
28.8 ( 6)
9.0 ( 4)
MEE
8.2 (2)
23.2 (28)
1.0 ( 0)
1.0 ( 0)
22.0 ( 2)
5.0 ( 0)
VA HD
Wdbc
Wpbc
Wine
Yeast
Zoo
Gini
5.8 (18)
10.2 (14)
1.0 ( 0)
11.8 (16)
22.4 (22)
10.6 (6)
Info Gain
10.0 (18)
10.2 (14)
1.6 ( 6)
8.4 ( 2)
22.0 (16)
10.8 (4)
Twoing
8.6 (28)
11.0 (20)
1.0 ( 0)
7.8 ( 4)
17.8 (12)
10.4 (2)
C4.5
26.0 (20)
15.4 (10)
13.8 (26)
8.8 ( 2)
135.2 (40)
11.0 (0)
MEE
23.4 (12)
5.2 ( 2)
1.0 ( 0)
6.6 ( 4)
25.4 (10)
11.0 (0)
Gini
Info Gain
Twoing
C4.5
MEE
p
Wins
15
15
11
1
20
0.00
Losses
3
0
5
27
9
0.00
Briefly, from the experimental evidence provided by the cited works [152,
153] one extracts the following conclusions:
•
A comparable performance with respect to test error rates is observed for
all algorithms; for instance, the Friedman statistical test (of the test error
rates) didn't reject the hypothesis of equal distribution, with
p>
0
.
4 in
both works.
