Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
0.75
1.813
0.7
^
^
h = 2
H S ,H R 2
h = 0.1
S
S
w 0
w 0
w 0
0.45
1.810
0.2
0
0.6
1.2
0
0.6
1.2
0
0.6
1.2
(a) c =0 . 2 ,d =1 . 2
0.5
1.5
^
h = 0.1
^
h = 1
H S ,H R 2
S
S
0
w 0
w 0
w 0
−8
−0.3
1.1
0
1
5
0
1
5
0
1
5
(b) c =0 . 8 ,d =5
Fig. 3.27 The left and middle graphs show H S as a function of w 0 for different
values of h and w 1 support [ c, d ] . The right-most graphs are the corresponding
theoretical curves of Shannon (solid) and Rényi's (dotted) entropies.
2+ e ( e +2)ln |e|
e +2 +2 e
1 tanh( a−w 0 )
q 2
4
V R 2 =
+
( b
a ) 2 ( e +2) e
1
tanh( b
w 0 )
2+ e ( e − 2) ln e
|e− 2 |
1 tanh( c−w 0 )
2 e
+ p 2
4
.
(3.76)
c ) 2 ( e
( d
2) e
1 tanh( d−w 0
The expression of the Shannon entropy is even more intricate [212]. For both
entropies it is possible to show that neither of them has a minimum at the
optimal split point (the min P e point); as also shown in the cited work, for
class-conditionals with equal-length supports, they have a maximum.
Figure 3.27 compares the behaviors of theoretical and empirical (2000 in-
stances per class) Shannon entropy curves as functions of the split parameter
w 0 , varying the class-conditional configuration. In all cases we assume equal
priors ( p = q =1 / 2) and fix w.l.o.g. [ a, b ]=[0 , 1].
In the top row of Fig. 3.27 the class-conditionals have equal-length support,
which means that the optimal solution is any point of the overlapped region
[ c, 1]. If the kernel bandwidth h is too small,
H S exhibits a maximum at the
optimal split point, just as H S .
Above a suciently large h (and increasingly larger with increasing over-
lap), the Shannon MEE solution is indeed the optimal split point.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search